35 messages in org.oasis-open.lists.office-metadataRe: [office-metadata] Suggested Chang...| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Svante Schubert | Jun 26, 2007 8:43 am | |
| Bruce D'Arcus | Jun 26, 2007 2:00 pm | |
| Patrick Durusau | Jun 26, 2007 2:14 pm | |
| Svante Schubert | Jun 27, 2007 10:59 am | |
| Bruce D'Arcus | Jun 27, 2007 12:19 pm | |
| marbux | Jun 27, 2007 1:25 pm | |
| marbux | Jun 28, 2007 6:29 pm | |
| marbux | Jun 28, 2007 6:38 pm | |
| marbux | Jun 28, 2007 6:45 pm | |
| marbux | Jun 28, 2007 7:03 pm | |
| marbux | Jun 28, 2007 7:11 pm | |
| Bruce D'Arcus | Jun 28, 2007 7:34 pm | |
| robe...@us.ibm.com | Jun 28, 2007 8:42 pm | |
| marbux | Jun 28, 2007 10:37 pm | |
| Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg | Jun 29, 2007 3:08 am | |
| Patrick Durusau | Jun 29, 2007 3:23 am | |
| Svante Schubert | Jun 29, 2007 3:40 am | |
| Bruce D'Arcus | Jun 29, 2007 5:46 am | |
| Bruce D'Arcus | Jun 29, 2007 5:48 am | |
| Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - Hamburg | Jun 29, 2007 7:06 am | |
| Bruce D'Arcus | Jun 29, 2007 7:30 am | |
| Svante Schubert | Jun 29, 2007 8:12 am | |
| Bruce D'Arcus | Jun 29, 2007 8:30 am | |
| marbux | Jun 29, 2007 4:49 pm | |
| marbux | Jun 29, 2007 5:39 pm | |
| Bruce D'Arcus | Jun 29, 2007 6:50 pm | |
| marbux | Jun 29, 2007 8:24 pm | |
| marbux | Jun 29, 2007 8:49 pm | |
| marbux | Jun 30, 2007 12:25 am | |
| Bruce D'Arcus | Jun 30, 2007 3:59 am | |
| Bruce D'Arcus | Jun 30, 2007 5:48 am | |
| Bruce D'Arcus | Jun 30, 2007 6:54 am | |
| Patrick Durusau | Jun 30, 2007 8:05 am | |
| marbux | Jun 30, 2007 1:12 pm | |
| Svante Schubert | Jul 2, 2007 1:08 am |
| Subject: | Re: [office-metadata] Suggested Changes on the Metadata proposal | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Bruce D'Arcus (bdar...@gmail.com) | |
| Date: | Jun 30, 2007 5:48:42 am | |
| List: | org.oasis-open.lists.office-metadata | |
On Jun 29, 2007, at 11:25 PM, marbux wrote:
From our perspective it would be better to aim for doing the job in ODF 1.2, even if that requires delay. We will oppose ODF 1.2 at ISO unless the interoperability warts are cleaned up.... We have decided to do that work via a fork of ODF; it is up to this TC whether it wishes to cooperate in that effort.
Who is "we"? Let's use proper names please, and take some responsibility.
In any case, I really think these vague threats are pretty reprehensible marbux. Even if I agree with one or two of your points on conformance, I certainly don't think the TC should be moved by your tactics.
And not only will I not have anything to do with a fork of ODF, I will publicly call it what it is: a self-serving and petty effort at extortion.
Bruce