atom feed38 messages in at.iem.pd-devRe: [PD-dev] run-up to release 0.43
FromSent OnAttachments
Miller PucketteAug 18, 2010 5:06 pm 
Hans-Christoph SteinerAug 19, 2010 11:18 am 
glerm soaresAug 19, 2010 12:16 pm 
Jonathan WilkesAug 19, 2010 1:21 pm 
Miller PucketteAug 19, 2010 1:44 pm 
Hans-Christoph SteinerAug 19, 2010 3:37 pm 
Jonathan WilkesAug 19, 2010 11:30 pm 
IOhannes m zmölnigAug 20, 2010 2:40 am 
IOhannes m zmölnigAug 20, 2010 2:54 am 
Matt BarberAug 20, 2010 8:58 am 
IOhannes m zmölnigAug 20, 2010 9:26 am 
Hans-Christoph SteinerAug 20, 2010 11:01 am 
IOhannes m zmölnigAug 20, 2010 11:54 am.pd, .pd
Hans-Christoph SteinerAug 20, 2010 12:57 pm 
Frank BarknechtAug 21, 2010 12:47 am 
Frank BarknechtAug 21, 2010 1:59 am 
IOhannes zmölnigAug 21, 2010 9:32 am 
IOhannes zmölnigAug 21, 2010 10:00 am 
Jonathan WilkesAug 22, 2010 10:20 am 
Hans-Christoph SteinerAug 23, 2010 8:32 am 
IOhannes m zmoelnigAug 23, 2010 9:07 am 
Jonathan WilkesAug 23, 2010 10:10 am 
Hans-Christoph SteinerAug 23, 2010 8:39 pm 
Matt BarberAug 23, 2010 9:40 pm 
Frank BarknechtAug 23, 2010 11:45 pm 
IOhannes m zmoelnigAug 23, 2010 11:57 pm 
IOhannes m zmoelnigAug 24, 2010 12:04 am 
Hans-Christoph SteinerAug 24, 2010 8:00 am 
Jonathan WilkesAug 24, 2010 1:16 pm 
IOhannes m zmoelnigAug 25, 2010 12:13 am.pd, .pd
Jonathan WilkesAug 25, 2010 10:16 am 
IOhannes m zmoelnigAug 26, 2010 12:04 am 
IOhannes m zmoelnigAug 26, 2010 12:18 am 
cyrille henryAug 26, 2010 3:34 am 
Jonathan WilkesAug 26, 2010 10:56 am 
Hans-Christoph SteinerAug 30, 2010 7:01 pm 
András MurányiAug 31, 2010 1:03 pm 
Hans-Christoph SteinerAug 31, 2010 1:28 pm 
Subject:Re: [PD-dev] run-up to release 0.43
From:Frank Barknecht (fb@footils.org)
Date:Aug 21, 2010 1:59:06 am
List:at.iem.pd-dev

Hi,

On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 05:06:44PM -0700, Miller Puckette wrote:

I'll try not to add new "features" but just fix bugs for the next 2 weeks

There is one bugfix I wish to have for a long time: make [wrap~] output 0 when it receives [sig~ 0]. I don't think, anyone really relied on the wrong 1, that wrap~ currently produces, so this backwards incompatible change would be resonable IMO.

My other wish is a feature: [tabpoke~]/[tabwriteat~]??? :)

Ciao