| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| John W. De Boskey | Oct 24, 2000 11:36 am | |
| Warner Losh | Oct 24, 2000 11:47 am | |
| David O'Brien | Oct 24, 2000 12:14 pm | |
| Wilko Bulte | Oct 24, 2000 12:17 pm | |
| Motomichi Matsuzaki | Oct 24, 2000 12:47 pm | |
| David O'Brien | Oct 24, 2000 1:08 pm | |
| David O'Brien | Oct 24, 2000 1:15 pm | |
| Motomichi Matsuzaki | Oct 24, 2000 1:31 pm | |
| John W. De Boskey | Oct 24, 2000 1:49 pm | |
| Wilko Bulte | Oct 24, 2000 3:28 pm | |
| David O'Brien | Oct 24, 2000 3:41 pm | |
| Jordan Hubbard | Oct 24, 2000 3:47 pm | |
| Jordan Hubbard | Oct 24, 2000 3:52 pm | |
| Motomichi Matsuzaki | Oct 24, 2000 3:53 pm | |
| Rogier R. Mulhuijzen | Oct 24, 2000 5:09 pm | |
| Andrzej Bialecki | Oct 25, 2000 1:07 am | |
| Tatsumi Hosokawa | Oct 25, 2000 3:37 am | |
| Tatsumi Hosokawa | Oct 25, 2000 3:48 am | |
| Terry Lambert | Oct 25, 2000 3:50 am | |
| Terry Lambert | Oct 25, 2000 3:52 am | |
| no...@ever.sanda.gr.jp | Oct 25, 2000 5:22 am | |
| Tatsumi Hosokawa | Oct 25, 2000 5:29 am | |
| Tatsumi Hosokawa | Oct 29, 2000 1:39 am | |
| Takanori Watanabe | Oct 30, 2000 6:15 am | |
| Nick Hibma | Nov 1, 2000 2:38 am | |
| Bill Paul | Nov 1, 2000 10:06 am | |
| Tatsumi Hosokawa | Nov 1, 2000 5:33 pm | |
| Tatsumi Hosokawa | Nov 1, 2000 9:34 pm | |
| Makoto MATSUSHITA | Nov 2, 2000 7:05 pm | |
| Tatsumi Hosokawa | Nov 2, 2000 7:31 pm | |
| Makoto MATSUSHITA | Nov 2, 2000 7:39 pm | |
| Makoto MATSUSHITA | Nov 2, 2000 9:51 pm | |
| Makoto MATSUSHITA | Nov 2, 2000 9:57 pm |
| Subject: | Re: "make release" breakage - dokern.sh patch 2 | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Motomichi Matsuzaki (mza...@e-mail.ne.jp) | |
| Date: | Oct 24, 2000 3:53:29 pm | |
| List: | org.freebsd.freebsd-current | |
At Wed, 25 Oct 2000 00:28:41 +0200, Wilko Bulte <wk...@freebie.demon.nl> wrote:
IMO NFS needs to stay. It is *very* useful to many (including me).
I vote for 'remove NFS away'. Yes, there are many people using NFS install, but it is site-specific.
The same argument goes for IPV6. In other words: it all depends on your viewpoint.
Again.
NFS is site-specific service. IPv6 is world-wide service.
Indeed, world-wide NFS is capable, but is somewhat ridiculous idea.
And more, IPv6 is network layer feature, and NFS is session and higher layer feature like FTP, HTTP, AFS and so on.
If IPv6 is disabled in IPv6-only environment, any of FTP, HTTP, NFS does not work. Disabling NFS causes minor impact compared with that, because switching to FTP is very easy, as already pointed out.
NFS is for convenience, IPv6 is for life.
The same argument goes for device drivers. Device drivers of storage devices are also for their lives.
-- Motomichi Matsuzaki <mza...@e-mail.ne.jp> Dept. of Biological Sciences, Grad. School of Science, Univ. of Tokyo, Japan
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majo...@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message





