atom feed27 messages in org.freebsd.freebsd-stableRe: Signal 11 on 4-Stable buildworld;...
FromSent OnAttachments
Shawn BarnhartJul 17, 2000 7:26 am 
Walter CampbellJul 17, 2000 7:33 am 
David UhringJul 17, 2000 1:40 pm 
Shawn BarnhartJul 17, 2000 2:19 pm 
Cyrille LefevreJul 17, 2000 2:22 pm 
Richard StanafordJul 17, 2000 3:37 pm 
ChrisJul 17, 2000 4:24 pm 
Kent StewartJul 17, 2000 4:29 pm 
Chad R. LarsonJul 17, 2000 5:01 pm 
R Joseph WrightJul 17, 2000 5:36 pm 
Kent StewartJul 17, 2000 6:29 pm 
Rodney W. GrimesJul 17, 2000 6:51 pm 
Richard StanafordJul 17, 2000 7:01 pm 
David UhringJul 17, 2000 7:08 pm 
Shawn BarnhartJul 17, 2000 9:09 pm 
R Joseph WrightJul 17, 2000 11:04 pm 
Kevin ObermanJul 18, 2000 8:02 am 
Mario Sergio Fujikawa FerreiraJul 19, 2000 1:04 pm 
Shawn BarnhartJul 19, 2000 1:34 pm 
Kent StewartJul 19, 2000 1:43 pm 
Mike MuirJul 19, 2000 3:47 pm 
Mike HoskinsJul 19, 2000 6:32 pm 
Mario Sergio Fujikawa FerreiraJul 20, 2000 5:50 am 
Jeffrey J. MountinJul 21, 2000 11:34 am 
Rodney W. GrimesJul 21, 2000 12:52 pm 
Jeffrey J. MountinJul 22, 2000 3:17 pm 
Rodney W. GrimesJul 22, 2000 5:32 pm 
Subject:Re: Signal 11 on 4-Stable buildworld; bad memory or what?
From:Chad R. Larson (ch@DCFinc.com)
Date:Jul 17, 2000 5:01:26 pm
List:org.freebsd.freebsd-stable

As I recall, Shawn Barnhart wrote:

The same machine had been running (blush) Windows 2000 since March with little or no problems -- no problem with lockups, blue screens, etc.

You mean, no problems you've noticed. You may very well be right about no problems, but please be aware that Windows will not detect/report many errors that will trip up FreeBSD. Quiet data corruption is the sometimes result.

-crl

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message