atom feed24 messages in org.freebsd.freebsd-archsome PRs
FromSent OnAttachments
Nicolas SouchuJul 16, 2004 1:08 pm 
Mark LinimonJul 16, 2004 2:33 pm 
Nicolas SouchuJul 16, 2004 2:51 pm 
David O'BrienJul 17, 2004 8:15 pm 
Robert MillanJul 18, 2004 6:33 am 
Bruce M SimpsonJul 18, 2004 8:07 am 
Giorgos KeramidasJul 18, 2004 9:31 am 
Robert MillanJul 18, 2004 9:35 am 
Robert MillanJul 18, 2004 9:51 am 
Kris KennawayJul 18, 2004 10:51 am 
Pawel Jakub DawidekJul 18, 2004 11:39 am 
M. Warner LoshJul 18, 2004 11:59 pm 
Pawel Jakub DawidekJul 19, 2004 1:17 am 
M. Warner LoshJul 19, 2004 7:23 am 
Max LaierJul 19, 2004 9:57 am 
Nicolas SouchuJul 20, 2004 3:23 pm 
Sergey BabkinJul 26, 2004 4:49 pm 
Giorgos KeramidasJul 26, 2004 8:29 pm 
Giorgos KeramidasJul 26, 2004 8:35 pm 
Peter JeremyJul 27, 2004 1:44 am 
Sergey BabkinJul 27, 2004 9:37 am 
Sergey BabkinJul 27, 2004 9:37 am 
Pawel Jakub DawidekJul 27, 2004 9:52 am 
Garance A DrosihnJul 27, 2004 10:39 am 
Subject:some PRs
From:Pawel Jakub Dawidek (pj@FreeBSD.org)
Date:Jul 19, 2004 1:17:13 am
List:org.freebsd.freebsd-arch

On Mon, Jul 19, 2004 at 12:58:25AM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote: +> : Even if it is used by some programms, I don't see it in the base system. +> : It can be always implemented as a kernel module and maintained outside +> : the tree. +> +> Given that it is implemented in this driver in about 20 lines, I think +> that it makes sense to have it in the base. Suggesting it be +> maintained outside of the tree is just plain silly. It should be +> brought in or abadoned.

It isn't even used by one of our 11000 ports and you want to bring it into base system? We don't have other devices in the tree, which are actually used by some ports. I still think, that if a port which is using /dev/full will be created, device should be maintained there. EOT.