21 messages in org.apache.httpd.devRe: Is async the answer
FromSent OnAttachments
Akins, Brian18 Jan 2008 10:51 
Justin Erenkrantz18 Jan 2008 11:16 
Colm MacCarthaigh18 Jan 2008 11:20 
Akins, Brian18 Jan 2008 11:26 
Akins, Brian18 Jan 2008 11:30 
Colm MacCarthaigh18 Jan 2008 12:07 
Akins, Brian18 Jan 2008 13:16 
Colm MacCarthaigh18 Jan 2008 13:28 
Ruediger Pluem18 Jan 2008 14:30 
Justin Erenkrantz18 Jan 2008 16:33 
Niklas Edmundsson19 Jan 2008 03:53 
Graham Leggett19 Jan 2008 04:45 
Davi Arnaut19 Jan 2008 06:57 
Jim Jagielski19 Jan 2008 07:04 
Graham Leggett19 Jan 2008 08:01 
Henrik Nordström19 Jan 2008 13:14 
Henrik Nordström19 Jan 2008 13:19 
Davi Arnaut19 Jan 2008 15:29 
Graham Leggett20 Jan 2008 07:44 
Akins, Brian22 Jan 2008 10:03 
Akins, Brian22 Jan 2008 10:07 
Subject:Re: Is async the answer
From:Justin Erenkrantz (jus@erenkrantz.com)
Date:01/18/2008 04:33:16 PM
List:org.apache.httpd.dev

On Jan 18, 2008 2:30 PM, Ruediger Pluem <rpl@apache.org> wrote:

IMHO it doesn't for the first request of the entity (the request that causes the entity to be cached)

I'd expect the predominance of large numbers would reduce the impact of the one-time performance hit...but that conversion away from a fd and into flat buffers, I feel, is more of a bucket brigade problem than an intrinsic fault of mod_disk_cache. -- justin