21 messages in org.apache.httpd.devRe: Is async the answer
FromSent OnAttachments
Akins, BrianJan 18, 2008 10:51 am 
Justin ErenkrantzJan 18, 2008 11:16 am 
Colm MacCarthaighJan 18, 2008 11:20 am 
Akins, BrianJan 18, 2008 11:26 am 
Akins, BrianJan 18, 2008 11:30 am 
Colm MacCarthaighJan 18, 2008 12:07 pm 
Akins, BrianJan 18, 2008 1:16 pm 
Colm MacCarthaighJan 18, 2008 1:28 pm 
Ruediger PluemJan 18, 2008 2:30 pm 
Justin ErenkrantzJan 18, 2008 4:33 pm 
Niklas EdmundssonJan 19, 2008 3:53 am 
Graham LeggettJan 19, 2008 4:45 am 
Davi ArnautJan 19, 2008 6:57 am 
Jim JagielskiJan 19, 2008 7:04 am 
Graham LeggettJan 19, 2008 8:01 am 
Henrik NordströmJan 19, 2008 1:14 pm 
Henrik NordströmJan 19, 2008 1:19 pm 
Davi ArnautJan 19, 2008 3:29 pm 
Graham LeggettJan 20, 2008 7:44 am 
Akins, BrianJan 22, 2008 10:03 am 
Akins, BrianJan 22, 2008 10:07 am 
Actions with this message:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Atom feed for this thread
Paste this URL into your reader:
Subject:Re: Is async the answerActions...
From:Justin Erenkrantz (jus@erenkrantz.com)
Date:Jan 18, 2008 4:33:16 pm
List:org.apache.httpd.dev

On Jan 18, 2008 2:30 PM, Ruediger Pluem <rpl@apache.org> wrote:

IMHO it doesn't for the first request of the entity (the request that causes the entity to be cached)

I'd expect the predominance of large numbers would reduce the impact of the one-time performance hit...but that conversion away from a fd and into flat buffers, I feel, is more of a bucket brigade problem than an intrinsic fault of mod_disk_cache. -- justin