15 messages in com.mysql.lists.win32RE: MySql bug?
FromSent OnAttachments
Andrea16 Sep 2003 23:29 
Andrea16 Sep 2003 23:50 
Larr...@contractor.amat.com16 Sep 2003 23:55 
Andrea17 Sep 2003 00:10 
Larr...@contractor.amat.com17 Sep 2003 00:16 
Andrea17 Sep 2003 00:26 
Larr...@contractor.amat.com17 Sep 2003 00:28 
Larr...@contractor.amat.com17 Sep 2003 00:44 
Andrea17 Sep 2003 01:13 
PF: MySQL17 Sep 2003 06:32 
Andrea17 Sep 2003 07:43 
Mark Matthews17 Sep 2003 08:04 
PF: MySQL17 Sep 2003 08:09 
Paul DuBois17 Sep 2003 09:05 
Andrea17 Sep 2003 23:06 
Subject:RE: MySql bug?
From:PF: MySQL (ml.m@in-genius.com)
Date:09/17/2003 08:09:39 AM
List:com.mysql.lists.win32

I know that other DBMS (for example PostgreSql and PointBase) use the same logic that MySql use. But I also know that MS SQLServer and Oracle use the logic that I described.

So I guess you have to ask yourself whether you want to write something that works on most SQL engines, or just the expensive ones.

If think it's all about program design and the way you approach things. I would personally use something else as a Primary Key and save the updates for non-PK records.

-Kevin