atom feed31 messages in org.oasis-open.lists.officeRe: [office] Digital Signature proposal
FromSent OnAttachments
Jomar SilvaJul 11, 2008 9:59 am 
Bob JolliffeJul 12, 2008 7:09 am 
robe...@us.ibm.comJul 13, 2008 12:12 pm 
Duane NickullJul 13, 2008 12:35 pm 
Bob JolliffeJul 27, 2008 1:27 pm 
Ming Fei JiaJul 30, 2008 4:02 am.gif, .gif, .gif, 8 more
Bob JolliffeJul 30, 2008 4:52 am 
Jomar SilvaJul 30, 2008 9:01 am 
Duane NickullJul 30, 2008 9:13 am 
Dave PawsonJul 30, 2008 9:40 am 
Duane NickullJul 30, 2008 9:51 am 
Dave PawsonJul 30, 2008 10:28 am 
Duane NickullJul 30, 2008 10:49 am 
Ming Fei JiaJul 31, 2008 9:17 am.gif, .gif, .gif, 13 more
Dave PawsonJul 31, 2008 9:56 am 
Jomar SilvaJul 31, 2008 10:32 am 
Bob JolliffeJul 31, 2008 10:42 am 
Dave PawsonJul 31, 2008 11:41 am 
Duane NickullJul 31, 2008 11:47 am 
robe...@us.ibm.comJul 31, 2008 2:43 pm 
Duane NickullJul 31, 2008 2:54 pm 
Jomar SilvaJul 31, 2008 3:15 pm 
Duane NickullJul 31, 2008 3:32 pm 
Ming Fei JiaJul 31, 2008 10:53 pm.gif, .gif, .gif, 6 more
Dee SchurAug 1, 2008 7:05 am 
Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - HamburgAug 8, 2008 5:57 am 
Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - HamburgAug 8, 2008 6:06 am 
Dave PawsonAug 8, 2008 6:11 am 
Bob JolliffeAug 8, 2008 7:06 am 
Michael Brauer - Sun Germany - ham02 - HamburgAug 11, 2008 4:49 am 
Bob JolliffeAug 12, 2008 12:57 am 
Subject:Re: [office] Digital Signature proposal
From:Bob Jolliffe (bo@dst.gov.za)
Date:Jul 27, 2008 1:27:12 pm
List:org.oasis-open.lists.office

Greetings

Given the recent discussions and consensus around workflow of proposals on the TC I would like to try and propose some kind of reasonable timeline for this one.

Can I suggest that (1) those who are interested try, during the course of this week ahead, to take a look at what is being proposed and return comments to the mailing list (2) on the basis of the above, we schedule an agenda item for discussion in two weeks - ie 11 August

My understanding is that what is being proposed should not be too controversial or disruptive so it is my hope that we do have some consensus by then.

There is an open question raised by Rob Weir around the status of XaDes. Jomar, can you tell us what is being referenced in Brazil?

Kind regards Bob

----- Jomar Silva <joma@br.odfalliance.org> wrote:

Greetings.

I've published today at the wiki (http://wiki.oasis-open.org/office/DSigProposal) a proposal regarding the Digital Signature support on ODF 1.2, basically expanding the existing XMLDSIG proposal to also support XAdES.

This proposal was developed by me and Bob Joliffe, as he previously announced on the list (http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office/200804/msg00216.html).

I'm waiting your comments.

Best Regards,

Jomar