14 messages in net.sourceforge.lists.courier-usersRe: [courier-users] Problem imapd.cor...
FromSent OnAttachments
Charles LacroixAug 10, 2006 11:00 am 
Sam VarshavchikAug 10, 2006 3:21 pm 
Charles LacroixAug 14, 2006 6:41 am 
HIROSHI OOTANov 15, 2006 12:41 am 
Milan ObuchNov 15, 2006 1:46 am 
Edwin L. Culp W.Nov 15, 2006 2:57 am 
HIROSHI OOTANov 15, 2006 3:26 am 
Milan ObuchNov 15, 2006 7:12 am 
Edwin L. Culp W.Nov 20, 2006 11:05 am 
HIROSHI OOTANov 20, 2006 5:56 pm 
Mark BucciarelliNov 21, 2006 5:43 am 
Milan ObuchNov 21, 2006 7:08 am 
Milan ObuchNov 21, 2006 7:12 am 
Mark BucciarelliNov 21, 2006 7:34 am 
Actions with this message:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Atom feed for this thread
Paste this URL into your reader:
Subject:Re: [courier-users] Problem imapd.core in my Maildir directory.Actions...
From:Milan Obuch (cour@dino.sk)
Date:Nov 21, 2006 7:12:04 am
List:net.sourceforge.lists.courier-users

On Tuesday 21 November 2006 14:44, Mark Bucciarelli wrote:

On Wed, Nov 15, 2006 at 04:12:44PM +0100, Milan Obuch wrote:

On a side note, I would like to know which add-ons are people using with courier. I have good experience with clamcour (security/clamcour in FreeBSD ports) and a bit with pythonfilter (mail/courier-pythonfilter in ports).

here's what we use with courier:

spamd & pf. clamcour crm114 roundcube

Are they all installed from ports?

if you could make the courier port build w/o fam that would be great. i don't need or want fam and courier natters on endlessly in the maillog.

Error messages in maillog telling about famd failure are sign of famd misconfiguration. Been there. As mentioned in other mail, I am inclined to make fam support optional in port. Still, I would like to know more about usefullness of this (or uselessness :) from the other side) to be better informed...

Regards, Milan