Hi,

There are some general things I have to say regarding this thread, which is, btw a discussion that I think is very important for Pd.

First, I do not think that technical reasons led to the fact that jMax got abandoned. IMO its social reasons. When I first met Miller just after he started in San Diego he still planned to continue on the IRCAM version of MAX. IRCAM MAX was commercial software so this was not possible, that is how Pd came into being (with a free license).

jMax died because it was not possible to get the community support, and when they had no money any more it just got closed. At that time probably most people were already using Pd or both, so it was not a big loss. Maybe it was a mistake to make jMax free software, and therefore compete with Pd directly. But maybe it was its salvation at that time.

This can't happen with PD because there is no money behind its development. Its based on a different development model.

This is also a drawback, of course. Some things can't be fixed easily because it would require a big amount of work, money to buy computer systems, and it might make other parts of the system unstable or incompatible.

If Miller had to stop to develop Pd now, we would soon see several versions of Pd popping up, competing against each other. This is already the case actually, it is not bad for PD per se, but it can be a terrible loss of energy. Well, I have my own version of Pd for PDA, so I shouldn't complain, but still I think it is important to focus our efforts.

This is also why I agree with Chris McCormick. I don't understand PD develpers who complain about missing features, or how main Pd development is handled. Its noone else but themselves who can change this situation. Miller has always been very open to contributions and he includes patches when time permits and also explains why he doesn't include others.

Günter

On Sun, 7 May 2006, Arie van Schutterhoef wrote: