atom feed16 messages in org.oasis-open.lists.docbook-appsRe: [docbook-apps] DocBook Website 2....
FromSent OnAttachments
Michael SmithApr 18, 2005 1:13 pm.bin
Oliver FischerApr 18, 2005 4:24 pm 
Michael SmithApr 18, 2005 5:45 pm.bin
Oliver B. FischerApr 29, 2005 4:36 pm 
Bob StaytonApr 29, 2005 5:01 pm 
Doug du BoulayApr 29, 2005 9:22 pm 
Dave PawsonApr 30, 2005 1:38 am 
Michael SmithApr 30, 2005 3:25 pm.bin
Michael SmithApr 30, 2005 3:50 pm.bin
Dave PawsonApr 30, 2005 11:33 pm 
Rene HacheMay 1, 2005 7:33 am 
Michael SmithMay 1, 2005 11:24 am.bin
Michael SmithMay 1, 2005 12:46 pm.bin
Michael SmithMay 1, 2005 1:02 pm.bin
Dave PawsonMay 2, 2005 12:53 am 
Andrei BoyanovMay 3, 2005 1:05 am 
Subject:Re: [docbook-apps] DocBook Website 2.6.0 released
From:Michael Smith (smi@xml-doc.org)
Date:Apr 30, 2005 3:25:04 pm
List:org.oasis-open.lists.docbook-apps
Attachments:
bin00024.bin - 3k

"Oliver B. Fischer" <ob@gmx.de> writes:

Hello!

It might be, that autolayout.dtd was not changed, but it could be confusing for some users, that website 2.6.0 used autolayout 2.5.0. I think it would be better that all files share the same version number. This is a much cleaner approach.

Actually, the more I think about it, it seems to me a cleaner approach would be to release the Website DTD/schemas separately from the stylesheets.

Btw, the header of website.dtd is

<?xml version="1.0"?> <!DOCTYPE webpage PUBLIC "-//Norman Walsh//DTD Website V2.6//EN" "http://docbook.sourceforge.net/release/website/2.6/schema/dtd/website.dtd">

but the files are under "http://docbook.sourceforge.net/release/website/2.6.0/schema/...

Argh. Now I realize why the DTDs were being numbered the way they were. As long as the DTDs and stylesheets are released as one package, I guess we are going to need to give them all the same version number.

We'll get this resolved for the 2.6.1 release.

--Mike