7 messages in ru.sysoev.nginxRe: using the upstream_hash_module an...
FromSent OnAttachments
jackdempseyApr 7, 2009 8:44 am 
Larry BatesApr 7, 2009 9:17 am 
Michael ShadleApr 7, 2009 10:18 am 
jackdempseyApr 7, 2009 10:54 am 
Cliff WellsApr 7, 2009 10:59 am 
Michael ShadleApr 7, 2009 11:16 am 
Cliff WellsApr 7, 2009 12:32 pm 
Actions with this message:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Atom feed for this thread
Paste this URL into your reader:
Subject:Re: using the upstream_hash_module and handling changes when adding new serversActions...
From:Michael Shadle (mike@gmail.com)
Date:Apr 7, 2009 10:18:33 am
List:ru.sysoev.nginx

On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 9:17 AM, Larry Bates <larr@vitalesafe.com> wrote:

I do something like this but solved it a completely different way.  I put storage behind the balanced servers and shared it among them using NFS.  That way every server sees a consistent set of files.  Otherwise users get "nailed" to a server and that sort of defeats the purpose of load balancing.  Hope this helps.

-Larry

yeah this is probably the traditional way, i do it this way as well.

nfs can be annoying though; i would suggest using freebsd, netapp or a solaris based server instance if possible. nfs on linux is notoriously weak.