On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 11:55:25PM +1000, Tim Robbins wrote:
On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 11:42:42AM +0300, Peter Pentchev wrote:
Could somebody take a look at this PR and the patch (quoted below), and
see if there's anything wrong with it or it may be committed?
if ((line = fgetln(gf, &len)) == NULL)
break;
+ if (len > 0 && line[len - 1] != '\n' && line[len - 1] != '\r') {
+ warnx("%s: line %d: no newline character", gfn, n);
+ e++;
+ }
I think that it's unnecessary (and incorrect) to check for a '\r' character
at the end of the line.
Okay, this might have been a bad habit of processing files that came
from Over There ;) So.. how about the patch with only the '\n' check,
then?
G'luck,
Peter