atom feed128 messages in org.freebsd.freebsd-currentRe: 3.0 -release ?
FromSent OnAttachments
Amancio HastyDec 1, 1997 11:26 pm 
Jordan K. HubbardDec 2, 1997 1:23 am 
Søren SchmidtDec 2, 1997 1:59 am 
Bruce EvansDec 2, 1997 2:02 am 
Jordan K. HubbardDec 2, 1997 2:29 am 
Jordan K. HubbardDec 2, 1997 2:36 am 
Poul-Henning KampDec 2, 1997 4:19 am 
Warner LoshDec 2, 1997 9:18 am 
Michael R. RudelDec 2, 1997 12:36 pm 
John KellyDec 2, 1997 8:10 pm 
Mark MayoDec 2, 1997 8:16 pm 
Greg LeheyDec 2, 1997 9:20 pm 
Amancio HastyDec 2, 1997 10:53 pm 
Jordan K. HubbardDec 3, 1997 1:12 am 
Jordan K. HubbardDec 3, 1997 1:45 am 
John S. DysonDec 3, 1997 4:02 am 
Amancio HastyDec 3, 1997 9:18 am 
Eivind EklundDec 3, 1997 10:03 am 
Brian SomersDec 3, 1997 10:29 am 
TomDec 3, 1997 12:35 pm 
Satoshi AsamiDec 3, 1997 3:05 pm 
Kevin DayDec 3, 1997 3:42 pm 
Steve PasseDec 3, 1997 3:54 pm 
TomDec 3, 1997 4:35 pm 
Kevin DayDec 3, 1997 4:59 pm 
Jordan K. HubbardDec 3, 1997 5:02 pm 
Kevin DayDec 3, 1997 5:02 pm 
John KellyDec 3, 1997 5:22 pm 
Satoshi AsamiDec 3, 1997 5:23 pm 
Steve PasseDec 3, 1997 5:31 pm 
John KellyDec 3, 1997 5:41 pm 
Karl DenningerDec 3, 1997 6:17 pm 
Nate WilliamsDec 3, 1997 6:38 pm 
Amancio HastyDec 3, 1997 7:22 pm 
Terry LambertDec 3, 1997 7:33 pm 
John S. DysonDec 3, 1997 7:45 pm 
Kevin DayDec 3, 1997 8:09 pm 
John HayDec 3, 1997 10:00 pm 
Mark MayoDec 3, 1997 10:21 pm 
David GreenmanDec 3, 1997 11:10 pm 
NarviDec 3, 1997 11:34 pm 
John HayDec 3, 1997 11:37 pm 
David GreenmanDec 4, 1997 12:01 am 
StuddedDec 4, 1997 1:00 am 
Jordan K. HubbardDec 4, 1997 1:39 am 
Ari SuutariDec 4, 1997 1:59 am 
Philippe RegnauldDec 4, 1997 3:33 am 
Jordan K. HubbardDec 4, 1997 4:57 am 
Søren SchmidtDec 4, 1997 6:00 am 
Philippe RegnauldDec 4, 1997 6:04 am 
Jordan K. HubbardDec 4, 1997 6:06 am 
John KellyDec 4, 1997 6:14 am 
Stephen RoomeDec 4, 1997 6:34 am 
John KellyDec 4, 1997 8:10 am 
Kevin DayDec 4, 1997 8:31 am 
Jordan K. HubbardDec 4, 1997 9:31 am 
Karl DenningerDec 4, 1997 9:32 am 
Satoshi AsamiDec 4, 1997 10:39 am 
Steve PasseDec 4, 1997 11:10 am 
Steve PasseDec 4, 1997 11:13 am 
Terry LambertDec 4, 1997 11:27 am 
John-Mark GurneyDec 4, 1997 11:42 am 
Terry LambertDec 4, 1997 12:11 pm 
Jonathan M. BreslerDec 4, 1997 12:36 pm 
Terry LambertDec 4, 1997 1:48 pm 
Karl DenningerDec 4, 1997 3:07 pm 
John KellyDec 4, 1997 3:16 pm 
Amancio HastyDec 4, 1997 3:44 pm 
Bob BishopDec 4, 1997 4:16 pm 
Eivind EklundDec 4, 1997 5:20 pm 
Terry LambertDec 4, 1997 5:21 pm 
Jordan K. HubbardDec 4, 1997 6:04 pm 
Warner LoshDec 4, 1997 7:22 pm 
Amancio HastyDec 4, 1997 7:28 pm 
Mark MayoDec 4, 1997 8:46 pm 
Mark MayoDec 4, 1997 8:59 pm 
Steve PasseDec 4, 1997 9:01 pm 
Chuck RobeyDec 4, 1997 9:24 pm 
Jordan K. HubbardDec 4, 1997 9:52 pm 
Shawn RamseyDec 4, 1997 10:33 pm 
Greg LeheyDec 4, 1997 10:35 pm 
Amancio HastyDec 4, 1997 10:49 pm 
Bruce EvansDec 4, 1997 11:46 pm 
Jordan K. HubbardDec 5, 1997 1:32 am 
Søren SchmidtDec 5, 1997 1:39 am 
Ari SuutariDec 5, 1997 2:37 am 
Satoshi AsamiDec 5, 1997 3:37 am 
Philippe RegnauldDec 5, 1997 4:21 am 
Terry LambertDec 5, 1997 12:03 pm 
Gary KlineDec 5, 1997 12:05 pm 
Jim BryantDec 5, 1997 1:19 pm 
Julian ElischerDec 5, 1997 2:03 pm 
36 later messages
Subject:Re: 3.0 -release ?
From:John Hay (jh@mikom.csir.co.za)
Date:Dec 3, 1997 11:37:36 pm
List:org.freebsd.freebsd-current

Perhaps I overstated the issue, I get up times of many weeks on my dual P6 here that is used as a development system. Obviously many others are also using SMP for real work. But the efficiency just isn't there yet. We would bench very poorly against a good SMP system, and thats what needs improvement b4 we go prime-time with SMP.

What about smaller steps? Stabilize the current SMP code and make a release with it (3.0) and then put the next stuff (threaded kernel, removal of the single kernel lock, etc.) in a next release. That way we have shorter release cycles and more people can get exposed to the new features that is currently in -current. I mean, there is nothing that say our first SMP release should be the ultimate one, is there?

Actually, there is, sort of. The problem is that a large number of people will be evaluating FreeBSD/SMP when it is released, and if the performance sucks, this is what magazine reviewers will say and is what people will remember. It's too important of a feature to have working poorly in the first release.

Ok, but how do we measure it, so that we can know when we get there? (I don't think it is realistic to expect that we will half the time that make world takes, except maybe if we throw lots of disks and controllers at it, for instance.) And how bad do we do at the moment? Things that are more processor intensive than syscall intensive like rc564, do get almost full speed out of the CPUs, so if that were a measurement we could ship now. :-)

John