atom feed42 messages in org.freebsd.freebsd-fsRe: [review request] zfsboot/zfsloade...
FromSent OnAttachments
Andriy GaponApr 14, 2012 8:37 am 
Andriy GaponApr 14, 2012 10:35 am 
Bob FriesenhahnApr 14, 2012 6:00 pm 
Garrett CooperApr 14, 2012 7:30 pm 
John BaldwinApr 16, 2012 6:55 am 
vermadenApr 16, 2012 10:34 pm 
Andriy GaponApr 17, 2012 1:21 pm 
John BaldwinApr 17, 2012 1:43 pm 
Andriy GaponApr 17, 2012 11:01 pm 
Andriy GaponApr 18, 2012 1:57 am 
Andriy GaponApr 18, 2012 2:18 am 
John BaldwinApr 18, 2012 6:41 am 
Ian LeporeApr 18, 2012 7:22 am 
Andriy GaponApr 18, 2012 7:36 am 
Ian LeporeApr 18, 2012 7:39 am 
Andriy GaponApr 18, 2012 7:59 am 
John BaldwinApr 18, 2012 10:47 am 
Marius StroblApr 22, 2012 2:20 pm 
Andrey V. ElsukovApr 22, 2012 11:23 pm 
Andriy GaponApr 27, 2012 2:05 am 
Andriy GaponApr 27, 2012 2:13 am 
Andrey V. ElsukovApr 27, 2012 3:37 am 
Andriy GaponApr 27, 2012 7:06 am 
Marius StroblApr 29, 2012 9:46 am 
Andriy GaponApr 30, 2012 12:03 am 
Marius StroblMay 1, 2012 1:20 pm 
Andriy GaponMay 3, 2012 8:02 am 
Andriy GaponMay 3, 2012 8:23 am 
John BaldwinMay 4, 2012 8:24 am 
Andriy GaponMay 5, 2012 2:30 am 
Andriy GaponMay 5, 2012 2:52 am 
Bruce EvansMay 5, 2012 3:49 am 
John BaldwinMay 7, 2012 6:52 am 
Andriy GaponMay 7, 2012 7:34 am 
Andriy GaponMay 7, 2012 7:46 am 
Andriy GaponMay 7, 2012 8:15 am 
John BaldwinMay 7, 2012 10:37 am 
John BaldwinMay 7, 2012 10:43 am 
Andriy GaponMay 8, 2012 12:14 am 
John BaldwinMay 8, 2012 7:15 am 
Andriy GaponMay 8, 2012 11:34 am 
Andriy GaponMay 11, 2012 3:31 pm 
Subject:Re: [review request] zfsboot/zfsloader: support accessing filesystems within a pool
From:John Baldwin (jh@freebsd.org)
Date:Apr 18, 2012 6:41:01 am
List:org.freebsd.freebsd-fs

On Wednesday, April 18, 2012 2:02:22 am Andriy Gapon wrote:

on 17/04/2012 23:43 John Baldwin said the following:

On Tuesday, April 17, 2012 4:22:19 pm Andriy Gapon wrote:

We already have a flag for ZFS (KARGS_FLAGS_ZFS, 0x4). So the new flag could be named something ZFS-specific (as silly as KARGS_FLAGS_ZFS2) or something more general such as KARGS_FLAGS_32_BYTES meaning that the total size of arguments area is 32 bytes (as opposed to 24 previously).

Does KARGS_FLAGS_GUID work?

I think that's too terse, we already passed a pool guid via the existing argument space. So it should be something like KARGS_FLAGS_ZFS_FS_GUID or KARGS_FLAGS_ZFS_DS_GUID (DS - dataset).

Ah. I do think the flag should indicate that the bootinfo structure is larger, I was assuming you were adding a new GUID field that didn't exist before. I can't think of something better than KARGS_FLAGS_32. What might be nice actually, is to add a new field to indicate the size of the argument area and to set a flag to indicate that the size field is present (KARGS_FLAGS_SIZE)?

Hmm, looks like we should name this structure and move it and the relevant KARGS_FLAGS_* fields into a header while we are at it?