atom feed39 messages in org.freebsd.freebsd-hackersRE: offtopic: low level format of IDE...
FromSent OnAttachments
Julian ElischerJul 8, 2002 1:47 pm 
Matthew DillonJul 8, 2002 2:08 pm 
John NielsenJul 8, 2002 2:10 pm 
Luigi RizzoJul 8, 2002 2:19 pm 
Julian ElischerJul 8, 2002 2:22 pm 
Terry LambertJul 8, 2002 2:36 pm 
Terry LambertJul 8, 2002 2:39 pm 
Kenneth CulverJul 8, 2002 2:41 pm 
Kent StewartJul 8, 2002 2:46 pm 
Julian ElischerJul 8, 2002 2:52 pm 
Robert KleinJul 8, 2002 2:53 pm 
Terry LambertJul 8, 2002 3:02 pm 
Bakul ShahJul 8, 2002 3:14 pm 
Bernd WalterJul 8, 2002 3:17 pm 
Julian ElischerJul 8, 2002 3:21 pm 
Doug BartonJul 8, 2002 3:36 pm 
Kent StewartJul 8, 2002 3:44 pm 
Peter WemmJul 8, 2002 4:36 pm 
Matthew DillonJul 8, 2002 4:39 pm 
Julian ElischerJul 8, 2002 4:51 pm 
Bernd WalterJul 8, 2002 5:32 pm 
Mike SilbersackJul 8, 2002 5:52 pm 
Greg 'groggy' LeheyJul 8, 2002 6:02 pm 
Terry LambertJul 8, 2002 6:39 pm 
Chris KnightJul 8, 2002 7:08 pm 
Terry LambertJul 8, 2002 7:12 pm 
Terry LambertJul 8, 2002 7:22 pm 
Kris KirbyJul 8, 2002 7:40 pm 
Peter WemmJul 8, 2002 7:43 pm 
Terry LambertJul 8, 2002 7:45 pm 
Chris KnightJul 8, 2002 8:07 pm 
Cy Schubert - CITS Open Systems GroupJul 8, 2002 10:12 pm 
Soeren SchmidtJul 9, 2002 1:39 am 
Don LewisJul 9, 2002 3:28 am 
David GilbertJul 9, 2002 4:00 am 
Chuck RobeyJul 9, 2002 5:56 pm 
Sergey BabkinJul 10, 2002 5:23 pm 
Terry LambertJul 10, 2002 5:57 pm 
David SchultzJul 11, 2002 4:08 am 
Subject:RE: offtopic: low level format of IDE drive.
From:Chris Knight (chr@aims.com.au)
Date:Jul 8, 2002 7:08:03 pm
List:org.freebsd.freebsd-hackers

Howdy,

-----Original Message----- From: owne@FreeBSD.ORG [mailto:owne@FreeBSD.ORG]On Behalf Of Mike Silbersack Sent: Tuesday, 9 July 2002 10:53 To: Peter Wemm Cc: Julian Elischer; John Nielsen; hack@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: offtopic: low level format of IDE drive.

[snip]

So, this basically means that even a journalling filesystem wouldn't be much safer... how about battery backed up controllers - would those provide protection? (I suspect not, but maybe they're more sophisticated than I thought.)

That's right - a journalled filesystem doesn't help. Nor does battery backed up controllers. If the drive has come back and told the controller that it has written the data, then the controller - battery backed up or not - will mark those sectors as written. If it's a caching controller, then the cache entries for those sectors will be returned to the free list pool. The only way a journalled filesystem would help is if during replay, it checked that all the sectors matched prior to the checkpoint; ie write out all the sectors after the last checkpoint, then check sectors prior to the last checkpoint. That way, the journalled filesystem would know that the data had been written correctly. Does anyone have a detailed list of which SCSI drives do track writes rather than sector writes?

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message