17 messages in net.clamav.lists.clamav-win32Re: [clamav-win32] Question regarding...
FromSent OnAttachments
Pandu PoluanJul 10, 2008 10:52 pm 
Nigel HorneJul 11, 2008 1:55 am 
Pandu PoluanJul 11, 2008 3:08 am 
Gianluigi TiesiJul 11, 2008 4:34 am 
SarocetJul 12, 2008 4:06 am 
Nigel HorneJul 17, 2008 12:54 am 
Robert WolfeJul 18, 2008 6:24 am 
Gianluigi TiesiJul 18, 2008 6:52 am 
Pandu PoluanAug 11, 2008 2:56 am 
Nigel HorneAug 11, 2008 3:13 am 
Pandu PoluanAug 11, 2008 3:13 am 
Geoff PartridgeAug 11, 2008 4:50 am 
Reza Mochamad DiannagaraAug 11, 2008 5:22 am 
Brielle BrunsAug 11, 2008 12:58 pm 
Geoff PartridgeAug 11, 2008 12:59 pm 
Pandu PoluanAug 12, 2008 12:49 am 
Brielle BrunsAug 12, 2008 6:59 am 
Actions with this message:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Atom feed for this thread
Paste this URL into your reader:
Subject:Re: [clamav-win32] Question regarding using libclamavActions...
From:Gianluigi Tiesi (sher@netfarm.it)
Date:Jul 18, 2008 6:52:28 am
List:net.clamav.lists.clamav-win32

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1

Robert Wolfe wrote: | On Fri, 11 Jul 2008 13:35:16 +0200 | Gianluigi Tiesi <sher@netfarm.it> wrote: | |> | So, to reiterate my question: Must "foo" be GPL-licensed as well? |> |> it must be gpl-compatible, you could make this kind of use with a non gpl
compatible license |> if libclamav was lgpl | | I would think that this would apply only if the program 'foo' were to be
distributed to the world. However, if it is an application for internal use only, I would think that this does not apply. |

gpl implies you need to give sources of what distribute in binary form together with the binary if the binary is not public you don't need to distribute to public

Regards

iEYEARECAAYFAkiAoDMACgkQ3UE5cRfnO06wgwCfWuBubwMNxG0M4onARkaLfwEP bJQAnRa95BHezUMPiEcJ8Tah7jAIiC7N =08R/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----