atom feed28 messages in org.freebsd.freebsd-currentadditional queue macro
FromSent OnAttachments
Jonathan LemonJul 2, 2002 7:53 am 
W Gerald HicksJul 2, 2002 8:08 am 
Ian DowseJul 2, 2002 8:12 am 
Garrett WollmanJul 2, 2002 9:53 am 
Julian ElischerJul 2, 2002 12:58 pm 
Jonathan LemonJul 2, 2002 1:34 pm 
Julian ElischerJul 2, 2002 1:47 pm 
Terry LambertJul 2, 2002 3:43 pm 
Julian ElischerJul 2, 2002 4:07 pm 
Garrett WollmanJul 2, 2002 4:26 pm 
Julian ElischerJul 2, 2002 4:35 pm 
Julian ElischerJul 2, 2002 4:54 pm 
Terry LambertJul 2, 2002 5:02 pm 
Terry LambertJul 2, 2002 5:05 pm 
Julian ElischerJul 2, 2002 5:50 pm 
Bruce EvansJul 2, 2002 11:57 pm 
Terry LambertJul 3, 2002 10:37 am 
Garance A DrosihnJul 3, 2002 10:46 am 
Neal FachanJul 3, 2002 1:46 pm.diff
Julian ElischerJul 3, 2002 4:04 pm 
Neal FachanJul 3, 2002 5:12 pm 
Daniel EischenJul 4, 2002 6:27 am 
Julian ElischerJul 4, 2002 8:36 am 
Daniel EischenJul 4, 2002 10:07 am 
Julian ElischerJul 4, 2002 10:33 am 
Daniel EischenJul 4, 2002 11:29 am 
Julian ElischerJul 4, 2002 11:40 am 
Daniel EischenJul 4, 2002 12:23 pm 
Subject:additional queue macro
From:Garrett Wollman (woll@lcs.mit.edu)
Date:Jul 2, 2002 9:53:44 am
List:org.freebsd.freebsd-current

<<On Tue, 2 Jul 2002 09:54:02 -0500, Jonathan Lemon <jle@flugsvamp.com> said:

Essentially, this provides a traversal of the tailq that is safe from element removal, while being simple to drop in to those sections of the code that need updating, as evidenced in the patch below.

The queue macros always guaranteed that traversal was safe in the presence of deletions. Julian's change is erroneous and should be reverted for compatibility with the other implementations of queue(3).

-GAWollman

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message