Messages per Month
29 messages in net.java.dev.jai-imageio.interestRe: [JAI-IMAGEIO] Mac OS X native ver...| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Marco Sambin - NeoLogica | Sep 6, 2007 8:16 am | |
| jai-...@javadesktop.org | Nov 2, 2007 3:19 pm | |
| robert engels | Nov 2, 2007 3:19 pm | |
| jai-...@javadesktop.org | Nov 2, 2007 3:34 pm | |
| robert engels | Nov 2, 2007 3:34 pm | |
| robert engels | Nov 2, 2007 3:39 pm | |
| Bob Deen | Nov 2, 2007 4:01 pm | |
| robert engels | Nov 2, 2007 4:19 pm | |
| Bob Deen | Nov 2, 2007 6:16 pm | |
| robert engels | Nov 3, 2007 12:28 am | |
| Marco Sambin - NeoLogica | Nov 5, 2007 12:39 am | |
| jai-...@javadesktop.org | Nov 5, 2007 5:12 pm | |
| Bob Deen | Nov 5, 2007 6:07 pm | |
| jai-...@javadesktop.org | Nov 6, 2007 5:00 pm | |
| Marco Sambin - NeoLogica | Nov 20, 2007 10:04 am | |
| jai-...@javadesktop.org | Feb 4, 2008 11:47 pm | |
| Marco Sambin - NeoLogica | Feb 5, 2008 12:47 am | |
| Fabrizio Giudici | Feb 6, 2008 12:04 am | |
| Marco Sambin - NeoLogica | Feb 6, 2008 1:01 am | |
| fabr...@tidalwave.it | Feb 6, 2008 3:35 am | |
| Bob Deen | Feb 6, 2008 9:59 am | |
| Brian Burkhalter | Feb 6, 2008 10:07 am | |
| robert engels | Feb 6, 2008 10:10 am | |
| Brian Burkhalter | Feb 6, 2008 10:16 am | |
| robert engels | Feb 6, 2008 10:24 am | |
| Brian Burkhalter | Feb 6, 2008 10:28 am | |
| robert engels | Feb 6, 2008 10:33 am | |
| Brian Burkhalter | Feb 6, 2008 10:50 am | |
| jai-...@javadesktop.org | Mar 10, 2008 6:50 am |
| Subject: | Re: [JAI-IMAGEIO] Mac OS X native version of JIIO | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Brian Burkhalter (Bria...@Sun.COM) | |
| Date: | Feb 6, 2008 10:50:34 am | |
| List: | net.java.dev.jai-imageio.interest | |
I expect that all these assertions are correct.
In fact for two of the natively supported codecs in JIIO (JPEG and PNG) that is exactly what was done. There are base Java reader and writer classes which are extended by the JPEG and PNG reader classes. As much commonality as feasible was moved up a level.
On Wed, 6 Feb 2008, robert engels wrote:
Agreed. But I think a lot of that work could/should be handled in a common abstract base class. A simple implementation might not be efficient in many cases, but it could be improved as time went on.
In reviewing the codecs in ImageIO tools source, there seems to be a lot of code duplication in these areas.