atom feed26 messages in org.apache.lucene.solr-devRe: lucene and solr trunk
FromSent OnAttachments
Yonik SeeleyMar 15, 2010 8:28 pm 
Mark MillerMar 15, 2010 8:43 pm 
Robert MuirMar 15, 2010 8:44 pm 
Chris HostetterMar 15, 2010 9:00 pm 
Robert MuirMar 15, 2010 9:14 pm 
Chris HostetterMar 15, 2010 9:38 pm 
Robert MuirMar 15, 2010 9:43 pm 
Mattmann, Chris A (388J)Mar 15, 2010 9:56 pm 
Chris HostetterMar 15, 2010 10:05 pm 
Robert MuirMar 16, 2010 5:30 am 
Otis GospodneticMar 16, 2010 2:57 pm 
Michael McCandlessMar 16, 2010 3:01 pm 
Jake MannixMar 16, 2010 3:01 pm 
Marvin HumphreyMar 16, 2010 3:07 pm 
Chris HostetterMar 16, 2010 3:45 pm 
Mark MillerMar 16, 2010 3:54 pm 
Jake MannixMar 16, 2010 4:08 pm 
Otis GospodneticMar 17, 2010 6:05 am 
Michael McCandlessMar 17, 2010 6:08 am 
Robert MuirMar 17, 2010 8:40 am 
Mark MillerMar 17, 2010 9:40 am 
Robert MuirMar 17, 2010 9:46 am 
Mark MillerMar 17, 2010 1:23 pm 
Chris HostetterMar 17, 2010 5:35 pm 
Mark MillerMar 18, 2010 10:27 am 
Michael McCandlessMar 18, 2010 10:43 am 
Subject:Re: lucene and solr trunk
From:Robert Muir (rcm@gmail.com)
Date:Mar 17, 2010 9:46:06 am
List:org.apache.lucene.solr-dev

On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 12:40 PM, Mark Miller <mark@gmail.com> wrote:

Okay, so this looks good to me (a few others seemed to like it - though Lucene-Dev was somehow dropped earlier) - lets try this out on the branch? (then we can get rid of that "horrible" branch name ;) )

Anyone on the current branch object to having to do a quick svn switch?

+1