atom feed10 messages in net.sourceforge.lists.courier-usersRe: [courier-users] Courier-MTA + Gre...
FromSent OnAttachments
Vasiliy KotikovMar 10, 2009 2:51 am 
Marcus IlgnerMar 10, 2009 4:36 am 
sergioMar 10, 2009 5:37 am 
Marcus IlgnerMar 10, 2009 6:36 am 
LuKremeMar 10, 2009 12:11 pm 
Alessandro VeselyMar 11, 2009 2:04 am 
Tim LythMar 11, 2009 4:12 am 
LuKremeMar 11, 2009 6:45 am 
cour...@thefreecat.orgMar 11, 2009 7:12 am 
LuKremeMar 11, 2009 2:06 pm 
Subject:Re: [courier-users] Courier-MTA + Greylisting
From:LuKreme (krem@kreme.com)
Date:Mar 10, 2009 12:11:53 pm
List:net.sourceforge.lists.courier-users

On 10-Mar-2009, at 06:38, sergio wrote:

I'm thinkig about change filter from spamassassin to greylist. Can you compare these two mudules?

Greylisting has nothing to do with spamassassin, and this is not an either/or situation, just like RBLS are not a replacement for spamassassin.

On my system, about 18-20% of the grey listed email eventually gets delivered. Of the 20% that gets delivered, about 50% of that is spamtagged by SpamAssassin. About 80-85% of the connections to the server are rejected outright (RBL, invalid hostname, etc), before greylisting has a chance at the message. If greylisting was in front of our RBL and header checks, it's percentages of ultimately rejected spam would be much higher.

-- This is our music from the bachelor's den, the sound of loneliness turned up to ten. A harsh soundtrack from a stagnant waterbed and it sounds just like this. This is the sound of someone losing the plot making out that they're OK when they're not. You're gonna like it, but not a lot. And the chorus goes like this...

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________ courier-users mailing list cour@lists.sourceforge.net Unsubscribe: https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/courier-users