9 messages in com.perforce.jamming[jamming] MAXLINE problem| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Domi...@csee-transport.fr | 14 Sep 2000 05:58 | |
| Dave...@vignette.com | 14 Sep 2000 08:16 | |
| Amau...@atsm.fr | 14 Sep 2000 08:43 | |
| Karl...@cisco.com | 14 Sep 2000 09:35 | |
| Dian...@yahoo.com | 14 Sep 2000 11:37 | |
| Domi...@csee-transport.fr | 15 Sep 2000 01:18 | |
| Dave...@vignette.com | 15 Sep 2000 12:09 | |
| Paul...@morpheus.demon.co.uk | 15 Sep 2000 12:19 | |
| Edwa...@yahoo.com | 16 Sep 2000 08:37 |
| Subject: | [jamming] MAXLINE problem |
|---|---|
| From: | Domi...@csee-transport.fr (Domi...@csee-transport.fr) |
| Date: | 09/15/2000 01:18:54 AM |
| List: | com.perforce.jamming |
Diane Holt wrote:
Are you sure it's NT that the line's too long for? Maybe it's too long for Jam because of what you have MAXLINE set to? I have mine (on NT) >
set to 32768, with no problem.
Well, I am fairly sure it's NT for two reasons: 1- the error message is in French (my NT is in French, but I don't think Jam has French error messages ;-) 2- if I type open a MS-DOS window and type an extra long command by hand, it stops after about 2000 (2048?) characters. I just can't type on, the keyboard doesn't work.
What makes people say that this limit no longer exists on NT4.0 ? Can I make it go away ? Is it a problem with the French version of NT ?
Amaury Forgeot-d'Arc wrote: > actions Link bind NEEDLIBS IMPLIB > { > echo $(>) > $(<:S=.tmp) > echo $(LINKLIBS) >> $(<:S=.tmp) > echo $(NEEDLIBS) >> $(<:S=.tmp) > $(LINK) $(LINKFLAGS) /out:$(<) $(UNDEFS) @$(<:S=.tmp) > }
and Dave Lewis wrote:
actions vLink bind NEEDLIBS EXTRAOBJECTS { copy nul: linkobjs.txt echo.$(>)>>linkobjs.txt$(NEWLINE)
What is the difference between these ? In Jambase I found an "actions Link bind NEEDLIBS", without IMPLIBS, and found no "actions vLink...". Should I modify the "actions Link..." in Jambase, or add one of these ?