atom feed1 message in org.oasis-open.lists.security-servicesRE: [security-services] Agenda for 31...
FromSent OnAttachments
Philpott, RobertJan 30, 2006 9:02 am 
Subject:RE: [security-services] Agenda for 31-Jan SSTC con-call
From:Philpott, Robert (rphi@rsasecurity.com)
Date:Jan 30, 2006 9:02:16 am
List:org.oasis-open.lists.security-services

Good catch - sorry - Here's the link to Ashish's doc:

[1]http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/security/download.php/16297/draft-saml-shared-credential-discussion-01.doc

Rob Philpott

Senior Consulting Engineer

RSA Security Inc.

Tel: 781-515-7115

Mobile: 617-510-0893

Fax: 781-515-7020

Email: rphi@rsasecurity.com

I-name: =Rob.Philpott

-----Original Message-----

From: Paul Madsen [mailto:paul@rogers.com]

Sent: Monday, January 30, 2006 11:57 AM

To: Philpott, Robert

Cc: Ashish Patel

Subject: Re: [security-services] Agenda for 31-Jan SSTC con-call

Hi Rob, the link under Ashish's name below points to Scott's Extensions

document rather than the Shared Credential proposal document

Paul

Philpott, Robert wrote:

Dial in info: +1 865 673 6950; Access code: 270-9441#

FYI - Spam on public comment distribution list has been reported to

OASIS and they are working on it.

1. Roll call

2. Approve minutes from 17-Jan SSTC con-call

* Re: [security-services] Draft minutes for 17 January 2006

SSTC telecon, with attendance data

services/200601/msg00040.html>****

* **Attendance correction noted at: **Re:

[security-services] Draft minutes for 17 January 2006

SSTCtelecon, with attendance data (correction)

services/200601/msg00045.html>

3. Heads up: New IBM research report on security of SAML 2.0

* Main focus is on use of artifact binding with web SSO

* IBM has requested a meeting with SSTC to discuss findings

and proposals

* Chairs will set up meeting and have asked IBM to provide

paper to TC

4. Constrained Delegation (saml-dev discussion thread continued on

main list):

* ScottC: RE: [saml-dev] Constrained delegation

dev/200601/msg00009.html>

* PrateekM: Re: [security-services] FW: [saml-dev]

Constrained delegation

services/200601/msg00046.html>****

* **ConorC: RE: [security-services] FW: [saml-dev]

Constrained delegation

services/200601/msg00047.html>******

* **ScottC: RE: [security-services] FW: [saml-dev]

Constrained delegation

services/200601/msg00048.html>******

5. **Potential Errata in Conformance for SAML Authority &

Requester******

* **TomW: RE: [security-services] SAML Authority and

Requester Conformance question

services/200601/msg00041.html>******

6. **AshishP: Shared credential draft document******

* draft-saml-protocol-ext-01.pdf

open.org/apps/org/workgroup/security/download.php/15207/draft-saml-

protocol-ext-01.pdf>

7. saml-dev discussion re: "strongly matches"

* TomS and ScottC: RE: [saml-dev] strongly matches

dev/200601/msg00011.html>****

8. **AI Review (attached)******

9. Any Other Business?

10. Adjourn

---------------

#0247: As per 17-Jan call: Prateek has received some feedback on the

constrained delegation profile and will produce a revision next week.

Owner: Prateek Mishra

<New AI>

---------------

#0243: Clean up text in Section 3.3.2.2.1 (RequestedAuthNContext)

Owner: Scott Cantor

<New AI>

---------------

#0246: revise the PE 10 wording proposal "clarifying that anyURI is

indeed the right interpretation" for the Reason attribute.

Owner: Jahan Moreh

<New AI>

---------------

#0180: Need to update SAML server trust document

Owner:

30-Aug: Jeff will not have time anytime soon to update the draft that

was posted. It was suggested that the info in the doc is useful, so

the AI is being left open in the hope that someone will volunteer in

the near future to take over as editor.

---------------

#0234: Nick to prepare some text for PE 23.

Owner: Nick Ragouzis

---------------

#0245: Per 17-Jan con-call: Greg W. to propose some clarifying text

for the attribute profile section re: the issues discussed on the call.

Owner: Greg Whitehead

<New AI>

---------------

#0244: Per 17-Jan con-call: Tom W. to send out a suggestion for

shoring up the conformance language to clear up the

requester/responder mismatch.

Owner: Thomas Wisniewski

<New AI>

---------------

#0238: Plan for red-line versions of SAML 2.0

Owner: Eve Maler

Per 8-Nov con-call: Eve-supposed to research on whether this was OK,

she thinks OASIS said yes. CYA notification as to non-normative vs

normative. Just haven't found the time. Keep my name on AI with speed

caveat. Scott- I will help (if necessary)

#0242: Recommended text for SAML Attr Sharing Profile

Owner: Rob Philpott

---------------

#0230: SAML Conformance SSL/TLS requirements

Owner: Eric Tiffany

Eric is concerned because implementation will be able to run over TLS,

but spec actually says you must implement TLS.

---------------

#0240: Status of SAML 2.0 submission to ITU T

Owner: Olivier Dubuisson

Per 17-Jan-06 con-call:

Abbie has asked Eve for help filling out a form having to do with

Liberty's PAOS spec, on which SAML depends. She will probably delegate

this.

Per 18-Jan email: Reassigned to Olivier Dubuisson

Olivier (and Abbie) - working the issue w/ITU-T. Olivier will just

need help from Eve in working the Liberty mgmt board.

--

Paul Madsen e:paulmadsen @ ntt-at.com

NTT p:613-482-0432

m:613-302-1428

aim:PaulMdsn5

References

Visible links 1. http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/security/download.php/16297/draft-saml-shared-credential-discussion-01.doc