8 messages in com.xensource.lists.xen-devel[Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] Add Initial M...
FromSent OnAttachments
Daniel Stekloff28 Oct 2005 18:33.patch
M.A. Williamson29 Oct 2005 09:29 
Sean Dague29 Oct 2005 12:07 
M.A. Williamson29 Oct 2005 12:13 
shino korah29 Oct 2005 13:31 
Daniel Stekloff29 Oct 2005 14:53 
Mark Williamson29 Oct 2005 18:37 
Kamble, Nitin A31 Oct 2005 09:52 
Subject:[Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] Add Initial Man Pages for xm and xmdomain.cfg
From:Daniel Stekloff (dste@us.ibm.com)
Date:10/29/2005 02:53:52 PM
List:com.xensource.lists.xen-devel

On Sat, 2005-10-29 at 20:13 +0100, M.A. Williamson wrote:

We can still check a pre-generated manpage into hg and ship it readymade; it's just that relying on developers to update the documentation tends not to work ;-)

I still disagree. :)

If we get this man page stub into the Xen tree, I'll start working on it again. My lack of motivation for this has been not having it there. This is something easy to do in 10-20 minute bites between (or during) meetings. ;)

OK, if someone can maintain the docs without going insane, that's also an acceptable solution ;-) As a general rule and for the sake of your sanity I think we should make "doesn't break the documentation" a patch-acceptance criterion :-)

Does the patch break the documentation build? I applied it to a clean tree and made that tree to test it. I didn't see any errors and the docs seemed to be made ok. I'm sorry if it broke documentation. Please let me know if I need to fix something.

Sorry,

Dan