310 messages in org.oasis-open.lists.wsrp-wsia[wsrp-wsia] [change request #208] Con...| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| 234 earlier messages | ||
| Richard Jacob | Feb 26, 2003 5:38 am | |
| Andre Kramer | Feb 26, 2003 5:55 am | |
| Rich Thompson | Feb 26, 2003 6:09 am | |
| Rich Thompson | Feb 26, 2003 6:11 am | |
| Rich Thompson | Feb 26, 2003 6:17 am | |
| Rich Thompson | Feb 26, 2003 6:30 am | |
| Rich Thompson | Feb 26, 2003 6:34 am | |
| Richard Jacob | Feb 26, 2003 6:48 am | |
| Andre Kramer | Feb 26, 2003 7:08 am | |
| Richard Jacob | Feb 26, 2003 7:29 am | |
| Rich Thompson | Feb 26, 2003 7:30 am | |
| Rich Thompson | Feb 26, 2003 7:34 am | |
| Rich Thompson | Feb 26, 2003 9:37 am | |
| Rich Thompson | Feb 26, 2003 2:34 pm | |
| Rich Thompson | Feb 27, 2003 6:33 am | |
| Rich Thompson | Feb 27, 2003 6:40 am | |
| Rich Thompson | Feb 28, 2003 9:41 am | |
| Rich Thompson | Feb 28, 2003 9:54 am | |
| Rich Thompson | Feb 28, 2003 9:57 am | |
| Andre Kramer | Feb 28, 2003 9:59 am | |
| Rich Thompson | Feb 28, 2003 10:02 am | |
| Rich Thompson | Feb 28, 2003 10:11 am | |
| Rich Thompson | Feb 28, 2003 10:19 am | |
| Rich Thompson | Feb 28, 2003 1:05 pm | |
| Rich Thompson | Feb 28, 2003 1:11 pm | |
| Rich Thompson | Feb 28, 2003 1:15 pm | |
| Richard Jacob | Mar 3, 2003 6:57 am | |
| Rich Thompson | Mar 4, 2003 7:10 am | |
| Rich Thompson | Mar 4, 2003 7:12 am | |
| Rich Thompson | Mar 4, 2003 7:15 am | |
| Rich Thompson | Mar 4, 2003 7:32 am | |
| Rich Thompson | Mar 4, 2003 7:37 am | |
| Rich Thompson | Mar 4, 2003 7:40 am | |
| Rich Thompson | Mar 4, 2003 7:43 am | |
| Rich Thompson | Mar 4, 2003 7:45 am | |
| Rich Thompson | Mar 4, 2003 7:52 am | |
| Rich Thompson | Mar 4, 2003 7:55 am | |
| Rich Thompson | Mar 4, 2003 7:58 am | |
| Rich Thompson | Mar 4, 2003 8:05 am | |
| Rich Thompson | Mar 4, 2003 8:09 am | |
| Andre Kramer | Mar 4, 2003 8:29 am | |
| Rich Thompson | Mar 5, 2003 5:39 pm | |
| Rich Thompson | Mar 5, 2003 5:39 pm | |
| Rich Thompson | Mar 5, 2003 5:39 pm | |
| Rich Thompson | Mar 5, 2003 5:39 pm | |
| Rich Thompson | Mar 5, 2003 5:39 pm | |
| Rich Thompson | Mar 5, 2003 5:39 pm | |
| Rich Thompson | Mar 5, 2003 5:39 pm | |
| Rich Thompson | Mar 5, 2003 5:39 pm | |
| Rich Thompson | Mar 5, 2003 5:39 pm | |
| Rich Thompson | Mar 5, 2003 5:39 pm | |
| Rich Thompson | Mar 5, 2003 5:39 pm | |
| Rich Thompson | Mar 5, 2003 5:39 pm | |
| Rich Thompson | Mar 5, 2003 5:39 pm | |
| Rich Thompson | Mar 5, 2003 5:39 pm | |
| Andre Kramer | Mar 6, 2003 1:15 am | |
| Rich Thompson | Mar 6, 2003 3:28 am | |
| Andre Kramer | Mar 6, 2003 3:39 am | |
| Rich Thompson | Mar 6, 2003 3:43 am | |
| Rich Thompson | Mar 6, 2003 3:48 am | |
| Rich Thompson | Mar 6, 2003 4:01 am | |
| Rich Thompson | Mar 6, 2003 4:12 am | |
| Rich Thompson | Mar 6, 2003 4:19 am | |
| Rich Thompson | Mar 6, 2003 4:28 am | |
| Rich Thompson | Mar 6, 2003 4:38 am | |
| Rich Thompson | Mar 6, 2003 4:44 am | |
| Rich Thompson | Mar 6, 2003 4:51 am | |
| Rich Thompson | Mar 6, 2003 4:55 am | |
| Rich Thompson | Mar 6, 2003 5:23 am | |
| Kropp, Alan | Mar 6, 2003 10:33 am | |
| Rich Thompson | Mar 6, 2003 10:54 am | |
| Rich Thompson | Mar 7, 2003 4:32 am | |
| Rich Thompson | Mar 10, 2003 7:25 am | |
| Rich Thompson | Mar 12, 2003 7:46 am | |
| Rich Thompson | Mar 12, 2003 9:52 am | |
| Rich Thompson | Mar 13, 2003 6:17 am | |
| Subject: | [wsrp-wsia] [change request #208] Conformance test requires cyclingConsumer? | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Rich Thompson (ric...@us.ibm.com) | |
| Date: | Mar 5, 2003 5:39:36 pm | |
| List: | org.oasis-open.lists.wsrp-wsia | |
Document: Spec Section: 6.1.3 Page/Line: 27/15-19 Requested by: Rich Thompson
Old text: If the portletState field has a value, the Consumer MUST return this value on subsequent calls using the same portletHandle. Note that such uses MAY span multiple starting and stopping cycles of the Consumer and therefore this state MUST be persisted by the Consumer until successfully invoking destroyPortlets() with the related portletHandle.
New text: If the portletState field has a value, the Consumer MUST return this value on subsequent calls using the same portletHandle. Note that such uses can span multiple starting and stopping cycles of the Consumer and therefore this state MUST be persisted by the Consumer until successfully invoking destroyPortlets() with the related portletHandle.
Reasoning: The way this is currently worded our conformance test would require cycling the Consumer (would that be a power cycle or a reboot?). Do we really want to do that test? This change would eliminate the requirement on our testing.
---------------------------------------------------------------- To subscribe or unsubscribe from this elist use the subscription manager: <http://lists.oasis-open.org/ob/adm.pl> .... ....