atom feed22 messages in net.sourceforge.lists.courier-usersRe: [courier-users] Re: MSOE6 argumen...
FromSent OnAttachments
Moshe GurvichJul 30, 2002 1:39 pm 
Sam VarshavchikJul 30, 2002 2:30 pm 
Moshe GurvichJul 30, 2002 3:05 pm 
Aly DharshiJul 30, 2002 3:12 pm 
Moshe GurvichJul 30, 2002 3:19 pm 
Sam VarshavchikJul 30, 2002 3:19 pm 
Moshe GurvichJul 30, 2002 3:21 pm 
Gordon MessmerJul 30, 2002 3:24 pm 
Moshe GurvichJul 30, 2002 4:04 pm 
Moshe GurvichJul 30, 2002 4:12 pm 
Sam VarshavchikJul 30, 2002 5:32 pm 
Juha SaarinenJul 30, 2002 5:53 pm 
Max SoukhomlinovJul 30, 2002 6:03 pm 
Juha SaarinenJul 30, 2002 6:16 pm 
Moshe GurvichJul 30, 2002 6:18 pm 
Sam VarshavchikJul 30, 2002 6:30 pm 
Binand Raj S.Jul 30, 2002 10:00 pm 
William Dell WisnerJul 31, 2002 2:20 am 
BenJul 31, 2002 9:29 am 
Gary EvessonJul 31, 2002 10:34 am 
Tim HunterJul 31, 2002 11:08 am 
DanJul 31, 2002 12:22 pm 
Subject:Re: [courier-users] Re: MSOE6 arguments vs. Courier IMAP
From:Moshe Gurvich (mos@kabbalah.com)
Date:Jul 30, 2002 3:05:43 pm
List:net.sourceforge.lists.courier-users

What's even funnier is that it was explicitly designed for MSOE. Sometimes it decides to keep sending the same garbage command over and over again. Each time the server rejects the command as invalid, it just resends it again, in an infinite loop. So, when the server receives too many consecutive protocol violations, this alert gets sent to the client, and the connnection gets forcibly terminated.

Maybe it's possible to ignore these garbage commands and not to reject?