1 message in net.sourceforge.lists.courier-users[courier-users] Re: courier mail serv...
FromSent OnAttachments
TrevJun 23, 2005 11:27 pm 
Actions with this message:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Atom feed for this thread
Paste this URL into your reader:
Subject:[courier-users] Re: courier mail server - repeated user unknownmessagesActions...
From:Trev (45@Safe-mail.net)
Date:Jun 23, 2005 11:27:27 pm
List:net.sourceforge.lists.courier-users

Randall Shaw <cour@randallshaw.com> wrote:

Plus it seems to be a bit less overhead by simply pitching an email

Less overhead?

If you behave as current netiquette recommends, and immediately reject a message addressed to an unknown recipient: [a] your system will never receive the header and body of the message, so you will consume no resources processing them; [b] the legitimate non-spamming sender, who simply misread an unclear hand-written e-mail address, will be informed that his message was not delivered.

If instead you choose to accept the message, and pretend to deliver it, just because you frellin hate spammers: [a] your system will receive the contents of the message, which will consume your network bandwidth and CPU cycles; [b] the frellin spammers will not care; [c] the legitimate non-spamming sender and the intended recipient will both be angry at you (justifiably) when they learn, two weeks later, that your system only pretended to deliver the message, because it was configured by a frellin spammer hater who didn't care about netiquette.

In summary: you should trust the people whose recommendations become widely accepted netiquette. They know stuff.