6 messages in com.mysql.lists.clusterRe: selinux and ndb| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Johnny Tan | 11 Dec 2007 15:28 | |
| Stewart Smith | 11 Dec 2007 16:38 | |
| Johnny Tan | 11 Dec 2007 17:17 | |
| Stewart Smith | 11 Dec 2007 19:35 | |
| Johnny Tan | 12 Dec 2007 09:20 | |
| Stewart Smith | 12 Dec 2007 18:14 |
| Subject: | Re: selinux and ndb |
|---|---|
| From: | Johnny Tan (linu...@gmail.com) |
| Date: | 12/12/2007 09:20:12 AM |
| List: | com.mysql.lists.cluster |
Stewart Smith wrote:
On Tue, 2007-12-11 at 20:17 -0500, Johnny Tan wrote:
[root@ck:~]# /usr/libexec/ndb_mgmd --print-full-config Error : Could not alloc node id at 172.16.8.10 port 1186: No free node id found for ndb_mgmd(MGM).
specify the config file too.
Do I need to stop the cluster to do this?
no.
I'm doing it from my ndb-mgmd box:
[root@mgm:~]# /usr/libexec/ndb_mgmd \ -f /etc/mysql-cluster.cnf -P Error : Could not alloc node id at 172.16.8.10 port 1186: Connection done from wrong host ip 172.16.8.10.
And, just to be clear, can I specify the same port in each [tcp] section?
only one process may listen on a tcp port at a time, so that constraint needs to be observed.
but no reason why all hosts can't have a daemon listening on port X.
I still haven't seen how it's supposed to look, but from googling it seems the use of portnumber under [tcp default] is deprecated. Is that what I'd be setting here?
What are the downsides?
johnn