14 messages in org.apache.legal-discussJSON license| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Jukka Zitting | Jun 6, 2008 1:51 am | |
| Jukka Zitting | Jun 6, 2008 2:02 am | |
| Niclas Hedhman | Jun 6, 2008 2:53 am | |
| Garrett Rooney | Jun 6, 2008 6:10 am | |
| Henri Yandell | Jun 6, 2008 7:34 am | |
| Sam Ruby | Jun 6, 2008 7:49 am | |
| Jukka Zitting | Jun 6, 2008 8:07 am | |
| Henri Yandell | Jun 6, 2008 8:13 am | |
| Garrett Rooney | Jun 6, 2008 8:16 am | |
| Roy T. Fielding | Jun 6, 2008 11:39 am | |
| Christopher Lenz | Jun 7, 2008 4:43 am | |
| Jukka Zitting | Jun 8, 2008 10:44 am | |
| Henri Yandell | Jun 11, 2008 11:36 pm | |
| Henri Yandell | Jun 15, 2008 6:20 pm |
| Subject: | JSON license | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Jukka Zitting (jukk...@gmail.com) | |
| Date: | Jun 6, 2008 1:51:19 am | |
| List: | org.apache.legal-discuss | |
Hi,
How does the JSON license (http://www.json.org/license.html) fit within the third partly license policy?
It seems like a clear category A license except for the "The Software shall be used for Good, not Evil" (!) condition. I'm not sure what to make of that, strictly speaking that's a FOU restriction that's in conflict with the OSI definition of open source.
BR,
Jukka Zitting
--------------------------------------------------------------------- DISCLAIMER: Discussions on this list are informational and educational only. Statements made on this list are not privileged, do not constitute legal advice, and do not necessarily reflect the opinions and policies of the ASF. See <http://www.apache.org/licenses/> for official ASF policies and documents.