8 messages in com.perforce.jamming[jamming] Some Jam questions and obse...
FromSent OnAttachments
Alan Burlison08 Nov 2001 04:41 
Craig McPheeters08 Nov 2001 10:52 
David Abrahams" <david.abrahams@rcn.com (David Abrahams)08 Nov 2001 11:14 
Roesler, Randy08 Nov 2001 11:56 
Alan Burlison08 Nov 2001 15:10 
Roesler, Randy13 Nov 2001 11:19 
Alan Burlison13 Nov 2001 14:40 
Alex Nicolaou13 Nov 2001 18:45 
Subject:[jamming] Some Jam questions and observations
From:Alan Burlison (Alan@sun.com)
Date:11/13/2001 02:40:13 PM
List:com.perforce.jamming

"Roesler, Randy" wrote:

Yes, rebuilting Jam.deps on each invokation would be required, but this should be cheap enough, as only direcctories with actual recompilations need to have their Jam.deps updated.

Nothing is 'Cheap' when it involves scanning several million LOC.

-- Alan Burlison

-- $ head -1 /dev/bollocks correlate homogeneous e-services, going forwards