atom feed310 messages in org.oasis-open.lists.wsrp-wsiaRe: [wsrp-wsia] [change request #201]...
FromSent OnAttachments
220 earlier messages
Rich ThompsonFeb 21, 2003 7:59 am 
Rich ThompsonFeb 21, 2003 8:20 am 
Andre KramerFeb 21, 2003 8:27 am 
Rich ThompsonFeb 21, 2003 9:51 am 
Alejandro AbdelnurFeb 21, 2003 10:55 am 
Rich ThompsonFeb 24, 2003 9:35 am 
Rich ThompsonFeb 24, 2003 9:45 am 
Richard JacobFeb 25, 2003 6:35 am 
Richard JacobFeb 25, 2003 8:32 am 
Andre KramerFeb 25, 2003 10:14 am 
Richard JacobFeb 26, 2003 4:02 am 
Andre KramerFeb 26, 2003 4:15 am 
Rich ThompsonFeb 26, 2003 5:26 am 
Richard JacobFeb 26, 2003 5:35 am 
Richard JacobFeb 26, 2003 5:38 am 
Andre KramerFeb 26, 2003 5:55 am 
Rich ThompsonFeb 26, 2003 6:09 am 
Rich ThompsonFeb 26, 2003 6:11 am 
Rich ThompsonFeb 26, 2003 6:17 am 
Rich ThompsonFeb 26, 2003 6:30 am 
Rich ThompsonFeb 26, 2003 6:34 am 
Richard JacobFeb 26, 2003 6:48 am 
Andre KramerFeb 26, 2003 7:08 am 
Richard JacobFeb 26, 2003 7:29 am 
Rich ThompsonFeb 26, 2003 7:30 am 
Rich ThompsonFeb 26, 2003 7:34 am 
Rich ThompsonFeb 26, 2003 9:37 am 
Rich ThompsonFeb 26, 2003 2:34 pm 
Rich ThompsonFeb 27, 2003 6:33 am 
Rich ThompsonFeb 27, 2003 6:40 am 
Rich ThompsonFeb 28, 2003 9:41 am 
Rich ThompsonFeb 28, 2003 9:54 am 
Rich ThompsonFeb 28, 2003 9:57 am 
Andre KramerFeb 28, 2003 9:59 am 
Rich ThompsonFeb 28, 2003 10:02 am 
Rich ThompsonFeb 28, 2003 10:11 am 
Rich ThompsonFeb 28, 2003 10:19 am 
Rich ThompsonFeb 28, 2003 1:05 pm 
Rich ThompsonFeb 28, 2003 1:11 pm 
Rich ThompsonFeb 28, 2003 1:15 pm 
Richard JacobMar 3, 2003 6:57 am 
Rich ThompsonMar 4, 2003 7:10 am 
Rich ThompsonMar 4, 2003 7:12 am 
Rich ThompsonMar 4, 2003 7:15 am 
Rich ThompsonMar 4, 2003 7:32 am 
Rich ThompsonMar 4, 2003 7:37 am 
Rich ThompsonMar 4, 2003 7:40 am 
Rich ThompsonMar 4, 2003 7:43 am 
Rich ThompsonMar 4, 2003 7:45 am 
Rich ThompsonMar 4, 2003 7:52 am 
Rich ThompsonMar 4, 2003 7:55 am 
Rich ThompsonMar 4, 2003 7:58 am 
Rich ThompsonMar 4, 2003 8:05 am 
Rich ThompsonMar 4, 2003 8:09 am 
Andre KramerMar 4, 2003 8:29 am 
Rich ThompsonMar 5, 2003 5:39 pm 
Rich ThompsonMar 5, 2003 5:39 pm 
Rich ThompsonMar 5, 2003 5:39 pm 
Rich ThompsonMar 5, 2003 5:39 pm 
Rich ThompsonMar 5, 2003 5:39 pm 
Rich ThompsonMar 5, 2003 5:39 pm 
Rich ThompsonMar 5, 2003 5:39 pm 
Rich ThompsonMar 5, 2003 5:39 pm 
Rich ThompsonMar 5, 2003 5:39 pm 
Rich ThompsonMar 5, 2003 5:39 pm 
Rich ThompsonMar 5, 2003 5:39 pm 
Rich ThompsonMar 5, 2003 5:39 pm 
Rich ThompsonMar 5, 2003 5:39 pm 
Rich ThompsonMar 5, 2003 5:39 pm 
Andre KramerMar 6, 2003 1:15 am 
Rich ThompsonMar 6, 2003 3:28 am 
Andre KramerMar 6, 2003 3:39 am 
Rich ThompsonMar 6, 2003 3:43 am 
Rich ThompsonMar 6, 2003 3:48 am 
Rich ThompsonMar 6, 2003 4:01 am 
Rich ThompsonMar 6, 2003 4:12 am 
Rich ThompsonMar 6, 2003 4:19 am 
Rich ThompsonMar 6, 2003 4:28 am 
Rich ThompsonMar 6, 2003 4:38 am 
Rich ThompsonMar 6, 2003 4:44 am 
Rich ThompsonMar 6, 2003 4:51 am 
Rich ThompsonMar 6, 2003 4:55 am 
Rich ThompsonMar 6, 2003 5:23 am 
Kropp, AlanMar 6, 2003 10:33 am 
Rich ThompsonMar 6, 2003 10:54 am 
Rich ThompsonMar 7, 2003 4:32 am 
Rich ThompsonMar 10, 2003 7:25 am 
Rich ThompsonMar 12, 2003 7:46 am 
Rich ThompsonMar 12, 2003 9:52 am 
Rich ThompsonMar 13, 2003 6:17 am 
Subject:Re: [wsrp-wsia] [change request #201] PortletDescription applies toclones
From:Rich Thompson (ric@us.ibm.com)
Date:Mar 4, 2003 7:52:56 am
List:org.oasis-open.lists.wsrp-wsia

A couple of comments:

1. I would find it weird for any cloned Portlet to not share the PortletDescription of the source for the clone. Is there a use case for them not sharing this metadata? 2. I would not want to introduce a difference between clones that depends on the method by which the clone was produced. This seems to add complexity without value.

Rich Thompson

Rich Thompson/Watson/IBM@IBMUS 03/04/2003 10:19 AM

To: wsrp@lists.oasis-open.org cc: Subject: [wsrp-wsia] [change request #201] PortletDescription applies to clones

Document: Spec Section: 5.1.11 and 6.3.3 Page/Line: 21/29 New text: When a producer clones a portlet, using the lazy mechanism described in section 6.3.3., the following values MUST be the same as the original portlet's description: markupTypes[]; groupID; userCategories[]; userProfileItems[]; usesMethodGet; defaultMarkupSecure; userContextStoredInSession; templatesStoredInSession; hasUserSpecificState; doesURLtemplateProcessing. Portlets explicitly created via createPortlet() do not have this restriction (call getPortletDescription() after clone()).

Reason: getPortletDescription is in the (optional) portlet management not the (required) serviceDescription factor. We could move it and force a consumer call to getPortletDescription().