atom feed16 messages in org.apache.incubator.sling-devRe: [RT] Shall we merge microsling in...
FromSent OnAttachments
Bertrand DelacretazDec 17, 2007 1:33 am 
Carsten ZiegelerDec 17, 2007 1:54 am 
Torgeir VeimoDec 17, 2007 1:55 am 
Bertrand DelacretazDec 17, 2007 2:03 am 
Torgeir VeimoDec 17, 2007 2:14 am 
Karl PaulsDec 17, 2007 2:21 am 
Carsten ZiegelerDec 17, 2007 2:21 am 
pi...@wasabicowboy.comDec 17, 2007 8:34 am 
Felix MeschbergerDec 17, 2007 3:02 pm 
Padraic HannonDec 17, 2007 3:09 pm 
Felix MeschbergerDec 17, 2007 3:24 pm 
pi...@wasabicowboy.comDec 17, 2007 5:32 pm 
Bertrand DelacretazDec 18, 2007 5:03 am 
Bertrand DelacretazDec 18, 2007 5:07 am 
Felix MeschbergerDec 18, 2007 5:19 am 
Bertrand DelacretazDec 18, 2007 5:55 am 
Subject:Re: [RT] Shall we merge microsling into Sling?
From:Bertrand Delacretaz (bdel@apache.org)
Date:Dec 17, 2007 2:03:17 am
List:org.apache.incubator.sling-dev

On Dec 17, 2007 10:55 AM, Torgeir Veimo <torg@pobox.com> wrote:

...Would this enable microsling to run without any OSGi framework at all?...

No, but as Carsten says in his "synchronicity" email (we didn't talk about that off-list before, honest ;-), the Apache Felix OSGi runtime is quite small, and starts very quickly.

Also, it would be one of my requirements to make OSGi invisible to beginners, and make it as easy to start playing with Sling as it is with microsling now [1].

So I don't think OSGi would make a difference for microsling users.

-Bertrand

[1]
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/sling/trunk/microsling/microsling-standalone/