4 messages in org.osafoundation.chandler-devRe: [Chandler-dev] Post-1.0 Chandler ...
FromSent OnAttachments
Grant BaillieSep 4, 2008 10:19 am 
Davor CubranicSep 9, 2008 12:33 pm 
Grant BaillieSep 10, 2008 10:30 am 
Davor CubranicSep 11, 2008 10:01 pm 
Actions with this message:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Atom feed for this thread
Paste this URL into your reader:
Subject:Re: [Chandler-dev] Post-1.0 Chandler Desktop Rearchitecture ProjectActions...
From:Grant Baillie (gra@osafoundation.org)
Date:Sep 10, 2008 10:30:26 am
List:org.osafoundation.chandler-dev

On 9 Sep, 2008, at 12:33, Davor Cubranic wrote:

Grant,

I agree with your point on focusing the rearchitecture effort on a minimum amount of code that will give volunteer developers a solid foundation to do the rest. But I would put forward a slightly different definition of what that minimum is: How about initially implementing as little of the UI as possible and putting the bulk of your effort into the Domain and basic Storage layers?

This would give us a working, well-tested Chandler "engine" that could do CRUD operations on notes, tasks, and calendar items, plus sharing and a callback mechanism for periodic tasks and reminders.

Interested plugin developers would then have the option to write alternate Chandler UIs. For example, I'd be interested in exposing a DBus interface to Chandler, running it headless, and then using a collection of desktop widgets for viewing the calendar, quick entry, etc.

Hi, Davor

Interesting ... certainly, the way we are building things (via plugins) would allow you to assemble what you want. How complete would you like the domain and sharing parts to be before you would think of implementing?

--Grant

Open Source Applications Foundation "chandler-dev" mailing list http://lists.osafoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/chandler-dev