Messages per Month
17 messages in org.apache.legal-discussRe: CMaps for PDF CJK Fonts (LEGAL-36)| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Henri Yandell | Oct 5, 2008 11:26 pm | |
| Geir Magnusson Jr. | Oct 6, 2008 2:33 am | |
| Henri Yandell | Oct 6, 2008 1:27 pm | |
| Jukka Zitting | Oct 6, 2008 2:22 pm | |
| Lawrence Rosen | Oct 6, 2008 3:54 pm | |
| Geir Magnusson Jr. | Oct 6, 2008 8:43 pm | |
| Henri Yandell | Oct 6, 2008 9:37 pm | |
| Henri Yandell | Oct 6, 2008 9:44 pm | |
| William A. Rowe, Jr. | Oct 7, 2008 12:13 am | |
| Jukka Zitting | Oct 7, 2008 12:46 am | |
| Lawrence Rosen | Oct 7, 2008 10:53 am | |
| Jukka Zitting | Oct 10, 2008 5:07 pm | |
| Lawrence Rosen | Oct 10, 2008 5:42 pm | |
| Henri Yandell | Oct 12, 2008 5:26 pm | |
| Jukka Zitting | Oct 13, 2008 2:55 am | |
| Jukka Zitting | Nov 27, 2008 3:21 pm | |
| Jukka Zitting | Dec 3, 2008 2:16 pm |
| Subject: | Re: CMaps for PDF CJK Fonts (LEGAL-36) | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Jukka Zitting (jukk...@gmail.com) | |
| Date: | Oct 10, 2008 5:07:32 pm | |
| List: | org.apache.legal-discuss | |
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 7:53 PM, Lawrence Rosen <lro...@rosenlaw.com> wrote:
Lets take Adobe at their word, and that there are patents pending. Further, lets leap to a pragmatic conclusion that the patents that are pending read on this code.
Should this change how we think about this?
Yes. Now I'm worried.
How should we proceed here?
BR,
Jukka Zitting
--------------------------------------------------------------------- DISCLAIMER: Discussions on this list are informational and educational only. Statements made on this list are not privileged, do not constitute legal advice, and do not necessarily reflect the opinions and policies of the ASF. See <http://www.apache.org/licenses/> for official ASF policies and documents.