

![]() | Start a set with this search |
![]() | Include this search in one of my sets |
![]() | Exclude this search from one of my sets |
![]() | Permalink to these results Paste this link in email or IM: |
| Atom feed for tracking future search results Paste this URL into your reader: |
20 messages in ru.sysoev.nginxRe: AJP Support| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Stephen Nelson-Smith | Jun 23, 2008 2:33 am | |
| Manlio Perillo | Jun 23, 2008 3:32 am | |
| Igor Sysoev | Jun 23, 2008 12:42 pm | |
| Stephen Nelson-Smith | Jun 23, 2008 11:54 pm | |
| Igor Sysoev | Jun 23, 2008 11:59 pm | |
| Stephen Nelson-Smith | Jun 24, 2008 12:11 am | |
| Igor Sysoev | Jun 24, 2008 12:22 am | |
| mike | Jun 24, 2008 12:26 am | |
| Stephen Nelson-Smith | Jun 24, 2008 3:45 am | |
| Henrik Vendelbo | Jun 24, 2008 4:02 am | |
| Igor Sysoev | Jun 24, 2008 4:03 am | |
| Stephen Nelson-Smith | Jun 24, 2008 4:16 am | |
| Igor Sysoev | Jun 24, 2008 5:23 am | |
| Phillip B Oldham | Jun 24, 2008 5:46 am | |
| Paul Dekkers | Jun 24, 2008 5:51 am | |
| Stephen Nelson-Smith | Jun 24, 2008 9:56 am | |
| Stephen Nelson-Smith | Jun 24, 2008 11:31 pm | |
| Dan M | Jun 25, 2008 12:52 pm | |
| Cliff Wells | Jun 26, 2008 11:40 am | |
| Igor Sysoev | Jun 26, 2008 12:20 pm |

![]() | Permalink for this message Paste this link in email or IM: |
![]() | Permalink for this thread Paste this link in email or IM: |
| Atom feed for this thread Paste this URL into your reader: |
| Subject: | Re: AJP Support | Actions... |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Stephen Nelson-Smith (sane...@public.gmane.org) | |
| Date: | Jun 24, 2008 9:56:20 am | |
| List: | ru.sysoev.nginx | |
Hi,
OK. I guess I could just have nginx balance the http traffic and have use tomcat's http server rather than passing through ajp13 traffic.
Just a curiosity: do you think this (nginx to tomcat via http) would be faster than using apache 2.2 with mod_proxy_ajp?
I don't know. I do know from my experiences with nginx that throughput on some of my other sites has been much greater, with fewer resources being needed.
I also know that my current setup isn't performing as well as I like.
I've heard very good reports about how quickly Tomcat can serve http responses. There's no static content - it's all dynamically generated. So it seems to me that nginx is the fastest and most resource effective way of balancing http traffic over my pool of tomcat servers.
I'm making some fairly big assumptions around how sessions are handled, but I've not seen problems with rails, so I'd expect the same experience with Java.
I'm not sure, but there's probably a reason for using AJP instead of http there ;-)
Hehe, in my case, when I took over the site it used Apacke and mod_jk. I've upgraded the systems and we have carried on with the apache/ajp/tomcat approach. I'm looking at alternatives now.
If nginx with http would be better/faster, that would be very interesting indeed.
It would indeed, I will, of course, do some benchmarks and tests first, and report back.
S.







