21 messages in org.apache.httpd.devRe: Is async the answer
FromSent OnAttachments
Akins, BrianJan 18, 2008 10:51 am 
Justin ErenkrantzJan 18, 2008 11:16 am 
Colm MacCarthaighJan 18, 2008 11:20 am 
Akins, BrianJan 18, 2008 11:26 am 
Akins, BrianJan 18, 2008 11:30 am 
Colm MacCarthaighJan 18, 2008 12:07 pm 
Akins, BrianJan 18, 2008 1:16 pm 
Colm MacCarthaighJan 18, 2008 1:28 pm 
Ruediger PluemJan 18, 2008 2:30 pm 
Justin ErenkrantzJan 18, 2008 4:33 pm 
Niklas EdmundssonJan 19, 2008 3:53 am 
Graham LeggettJan 19, 2008 4:45 am 
Davi ArnautJan 19, 2008 6:57 am 
Jim JagielskiJan 19, 2008 7:04 am 
Graham LeggettJan 19, 2008 8:01 am 
Henrik NordströmJan 19, 2008 1:14 pm 
Henrik NordströmJan 19, 2008 1:19 pm 
Davi ArnautJan 19, 2008 3:29 pm 
Graham LeggettJan 20, 2008 7:44 am 
Akins, BrianJan 22, 2008 10:03 am 
Akins, BrianJan 22, 2008 10:07 am 
Actions with this message:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Atom feed for this thread
Paste this URL into your reader:
Subject:Re: Is async the answerActions...
From:Davi Arnaut (da@apache.org)
Date:Jan 19, 2008 6:57:06 am
List:org.apache.httpd.dev

Akins, Brian wrote:

On 1/18/08 3:07 PM, "Colm MacCarthaigh" <co@allcosts.net> wrote:

That's not even a consideration, async is really for dynamic content, proxies, and other non-sendfile content.

For dynamic stuff, "X-sendfile" works well. (Just really starting to play with that, liking it so far).

The proxy that the LiveJournal folks wrote, I think, copies all the data from the origin server into a file and then uses sendfile to send to the client...

Doesn't this limit the network bandwidth to the bandwidth of the disk and/or file system?

-- Davi Arnaut