atom feed22 messages in org.freebsd.freebsd-portsRe: Instafix for FreeBSD ports broken...
FromSent OnAttachments
Ed SchoutenSep 29, 2011 1:47 am 
Ed SchoutenSep 29, 2011 1:50 am 
Matthew SeamanSep 29, 2011 2:01 am 
Ed SchoutenSep 29, 2011 2:07 am 
Ed SchoutenSep 29, 2011 2:18 am.diff
Erwin LansingSep 29, 2011 2:47 am 
Xin LISep 29, 2011 3:08 am 
Ed SchoutenSep 29, 2011 3:11 am 
Stanislav SedovSep 29, 2011 1:42 pm 
Stanislav SedovSep 29, 2011 1:46 pm 
Eitan AdlerSep 29, 2011 2:40 pm 
Stanislav SedovSep 29, 2011 4:12 pm 
Sergey V. DyatkoSep 29, 2011 11:28 pm 
Chris ReesSep 30, 2011 1:31 am 
Ed SchoutenSep 30, 2011 1:39 am 
Chris ReesSep 30, 2011 1:56 am 
Erwin LansingSep 30, 2011 2:09 am 
Jim TriggSep 30, 2011 2:09 pm 
Beech RintoulSep 30, 2011 2:50 pm 
Peter JeremyOct 1, 2011 2:36 pm 
Jilles TjoelkerOct 2, 2011 9:23 am 
Ed SchoutenOct 2, 2011 12:30 pm 
Subject:Re: Instafix for FreeBSD ports brokenness on 10.0?
From:Beech Rintoul (bee@freebsd.org)
Date:Sep 30, 2011 2:50:04 pm
List:org.freebsd.freebsd-ports

On Friday 30 September 2011 13:10:20 Jim Trigg wrote:

On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 5:10 AM, Erwin Lansing <erw@freebsd.org> wrote:

That said, this patch is the wrong place to fix a problem to autotools. It needs to be fixed in autotools, not bsd.port.mk. No matter if it's bsd.ports.mk or autotools, such a fix needs proper testing, for which we do not currently have the resources as we are concentrating on releasing 9.0. I would suggest you do the same and make 9.0 the best release possible during the next few weeks, after that we'll start looking into 10.0.

I have to admit that my reaction is not so much "Why won't you fix ports for 10.0" as "Why was 9.0 dropped out of CURRENT and 10.0 introduced before 9.0 went STABLE?"

At this point 9.0 and 10.0 are virtually identical. I really doubt that there will be much development in -CURRENT till after 9.0 is released anyway.

A couple of the temporary fixes worked for me, so I can still update if I need to. All in all this is minor compared to a few years ago when all development was done directly on the head branch. You never knew from day to day and sometimes by the hour if -CURRENT would even build let alone run. This is just a bump in the road by comparison.

Beech