Keir Fraser <Keir...@cl.cam.ac.uk> 30.05.06 10:49 >>>
On 30 May 2006, at 09:11, Jan Beulich wrote:
Indeed, this was the behavior I intended, but somehow I failed to find
the VCPUOP_down operation that I was looking
for. Here's an updated patch.
Given that you went for the more complicated definition of halt() that
calls block when event delivery is enabled, is it actually necessary to
not compile the halt-checking routine? If event delivery is enabled in
What halt-checking routine do you mean here?
that function, shouldn't we return from each invocation of halt() on
(at least) each timer interrupt? If not, I wonder why our behaviour
there differs from native?
Yes, I think the net effect should be similar behavior to native.
Jan
6 messages in com.xensource.lists.xen-develRe: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86 linux: pr...
.patch