| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| ric...@us.ibm.com | May 22, 2006 8:35 am | |
| Rich Thompson | May 22, 2006 8:56 am | |
| Rich Thompson | May 22, 2006 10:53 am | |
| Rich Thompson | May 23, 2006 7:40 am | |
| Rich Thompson | May 23, 2006 3:04 pm | |
| Michael Freedman | May 23, 2006 3:05 pm | |
| Subbu Allamaraju | May 23, 2006 4:01 pm |
| Subject: | Re: [wsrp] schemaLocation in 5.1.11 & 5.1.12 | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Rich Thompson (ric...@us.ibm.com) | |
| Date: | May 23, 2006 3:04:16 pm | |
| List: | org.oasis-open.lists.wsrp | |
Yes, ServiceDescription.schemaTypes and ModelDescription.modelTypes are both of type ModelType.
The reason that we had originally not placed the modelTypes field directly within PropertyDescription was a hope that types would be reused while seeking to just transmit the type information once. I don't think that matters for the URI of a schemaLocation field and there certainly is value to placing it next to the type declaration. The question is how far to push this model now that ExtensionDescription and EventDescription have the same issues. I don't think they can cleanly reuse the ModelDescription type, but perhaps a wrapper type like it would be appropriate.
Rich
Subbu Allamaraju To Rich Thompson/Watson/IBM@IBMUS <sub...@bea.com> cc ws...@lists.oasis-open.org Subject Re: [wsrp] schemaLocation in 5.1.11 & 05/23/06 04:46 PM 5.1.12
I agree. It seems somewhat inconsistent to specify schemaTypes outside respective Description types. For instance, event's type can be referenced via EventDescription.schemaLocation, or the ServiceDescription.schemaTypes. This makes consumers look into two different places to decipher types.
We could consolidate these two into ModelDescription, and make ModelDescription contain schemaLocation and schemaTypes.
BTW, isn't schemaTypes the same as ModelDescription.modelTypes? With the consoliation, schemaTypes would go away completely.
Subbu
Rich Thompson wrote:
In starting to add the language requested on the last TC call, it struck me that it would be cleaner to use the ModelDescription type for describing session properties rather than having a separate schemaTypes field in 5.1.16 (PortletDescription). Any objections/comments?
Rich
*Rich Thompson/Watson/IBM@IBMUS*
05/22/06 01:53 PM
To ws...@lists.oasis-open.org cc
Subject [wsrp] locale definition
The F2F asked me to locate and add a reference to the actual definition of locales. I think this is RFC3066 (_http://tools.ietf.org/html/3066_) and am adding that reference to section 5.1.10 for wd17. If someone has a better reference, please post it soon.
Rich --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that generates this mail. You may a link to this group and all your TCs in OASIS at: https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that generates this mail. You may a link to this group and all your TCs in OASIS at: https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php





