8 messages in org.w3.www-rdf-calendarRe: revert recent timezone changes? p...| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Dan Connolly | Oct 14, 2004 8:35 am | |
| Masahide Kanzaki | Oct 14, 2004 9:23 am | |
| dan...@w3.org | Oct 14, 2004 8:11 pm | |
| Leo Sauermann | Oct 15, 2004 1:16 am | |
| Dan Connolly | Oct 19, 2004 6:25 am | |
| Leo Sauermann | Oct 21, 2004 1:15 am | |
| Dan Connolly | Oct 21, 2004 5:52 am | |
| Leo Sauermann | Oct 22, 2004 1:26 am |
| Subject: | Re: revert recent timezone changes? put them in a new schema? | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Dan Connolly (conn...@w3.org) | |
| Date: | Oct 19, 2004 6:25:33 am | |
| List: | org.w3.www-rdf-calendar | |
On Thu, 2004-10-14 at 11:24, Masahide Kanzaki wrote:
At 10:35 AM -0500 04.10.14, Dan Connolly wrote:
I wonder if I should roll back the timezone changes and start a new schema with the new timezone design.
I'm not inclined to maintain 2 schemas. I'm willing to move new development to schema with a URI different from http://www.w3.org/2002/12/cal/ical but I'm not offering to do maintenance on that one as well as new development.
Yes, yes. It's very welcome to roll back the changes in the schema of current URI, as well as to discuss and develop modified schema with a new namespace URI.
Hmm... it seems that I never actually rolled them forward in the 1st place.
I proposed the changes 14 Apr 2004 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-calendar/2004Apr/0022.html
but the schema is at revision 1.14 date: 2004/04/07 18:45:16 http://www.w3.org/2002/12/cal/ical
The tests and conversion tools will migrate to the new schema, I think; I don't think I can afford to keep 2 sets of them around.
That's fine. Keep existing data as is, and move forward.
cheers,
-- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E