 | Start a set with this search |
 | Include this search in one of my sets |
 | Exclude this search from one of my sets |
 | Permalink to these results Paste this link in email or IM: |
 | Atom feed for tracking future search results Paste this URL into your reader: |
8 messages in net.java.dev.jna.usersRe: [jna-users] Java posix binding pr...| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| Kevin Burton | Mar 25, 2009 7:11 pm | |
| Timothy Wall | Mar 26, 2009 5:57 am | |
| Corey Puffalt | Mar 26, 2009 9:08 am | |
| Timothy Wall | Mar 26, 2009 10:26 am | |
| Peter Reilly | Apr 14, 2009 12:47 pm | |
| Kevin Burton | Apr 14, 2009 1:42 pm | |
| Charles Oliver Nutter | Apr 14, 2009 4:15 pm | |
| Kevin Burton | Apr 14, 2009 4:33 pm |
| Permalink for this message Paste this link in email or IM: |
| Permalink for this thread Paste this link in email or IM: |
| Atom feed for this thread Paste this URL into your reader: |
| Subject: | Re: [jna-users] Java posix binding project.... | Actions... |
|---|---|---|
| From: | Kevin Burton (bur...@spinn3r.com) | |
| Date: | Apr 14, 2009 4:33:41 pm | |
| List: | net.java.dev.jna.users | |
Yeah... I'm definitely fine with avoiding duplication of effort.
It might make sense to make two interfaces. One that's fully OO and one that's more C/posix like.
Kevin
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 4:16 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter < char...@sun.com> wrote:
jna-posix started out pretty simple, but it quickly became apparent we'd need better smarts for it to work across platform. I'd like to avoid duplicating effort too, so maybe your library could be folded into jna-posix? Really it would just need to have a class full of static methods that use a global POSIX instance from jna-posix. Then you're essentially done, and jna-posix will handle all the platform selection, etc.
Kevin Burton wrote:
I saw that one eventually.... I took the approach to make everything static imports so the API is a bit more like Posix.....
They should also make it with a tar.gz, etc...... either way, my implementation is like 100 lines of code so I'm not super worried about duplicated effort right now :)
Kevin
On Tue, Apr 14, 2009 at 12:48 PM, Peter Reilly < pete...@gmail.com <mailto:pete...@gmail.com>> wrote:
There is already such a project: http://kenai.com/projects/jna-posix
Peter
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 3:11 AM, Kevin Burton <bur...@spinn3r.com <mailto:bur...@spinn3r.com>> wrote: > Hey guys. > I've started a simple posix binding project for use internally. I have the > need for mkfifo, stat, etc. > It would seem to make sense to open source this and put it on google > code.... > Any thoughts as to whether this would be a good idea? > Kevin > > -- > Founder/CEO Spinn3r.com > Location: San Francisco, CA > AIM/YIM: sfburtonator > Skype: burtonator > Work: http://spinn3r.com >
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: user...@jna.dev.java.net <mailto:user...@jna.dev.java.net> For additional commands, e-mail: user...@jna.dev.java.net <mailto:user...@jna.dev.java.net>
-- Founder/CEO Spinn3r.com Location: San Francisco, CA AIM/YIM: sfburtonator Skype: burtonator Work: http://spinn3r.com
-- Founder/CEO Spinn3r.com Location: San Francisco, CA AIM/YIM: sfburtonator Skype: burtonator Work: http://spinn3r.com