atom feed23 messages in org.oasis-open.lists.office-metadataRe: [office-metadata] Minor Draft Cha...
FromSent OnAttachments
Bruce D'ArcusAug 22, 2007 5:18 pm 
Svante SchubertAug 23, 2007 9:25 am 
Patrick DurusauAug 23, 2007 10:21 am 
Bruce D'ArcusAug 23, 2007 11:10 am 
Patrick DurusauAug 23, 2007 12:35 pm 
Bruce D'ArcusAug 23, 2007 12:58 pm 
Svante SchubertAug 24, 2007 2:35 am 
Patrick DurusauAug 24, 2007 3:04 am 
Bruce D'ArcusAug 24, 2007 5:12 am 
Svante SchubertAug 24, 2007 5:21 am 
Bruce D'ArcusAug 24, 2007 6:31 am 
Svante SchubertAug 24, 2007 8:32 am 
Bruce D'ArcusAug 25, 2007 9:03 am 
Svante SchubertAug 27, 2007 5:16 am 
Patrick DurusauAug 27, 2007 5:38 am 
Svante SchubertAug 27, 2007 9:10 am 
Bruce D'ArcusAug 27, 2007 11:47 am 
John MaddenAug 27, 2007 2:31 pm 
Svante SchubertSep 5, 2007 3:02 am 
John F. Madden, MD, PhDSep 5, 2007 8:02 am 
Svante SchubertSep 5, 2007 9:28 am 
John F. Madden, MD, PhDSep 6, 2007 12:32 pm.png, .png
Bruce D'ArcusSep 6, 2007 12:35 pm 
Subject:Re: [office-metadata] Minor Draft Change: Usage of Data Styles on Meta Fields
From:John F. Madden, MD, PhD (john@duke.edu)
Date:Sep 6, 2007 12:32:05 pm
List:org.oasis-open.lists.office-metadata
Attachments:

Guys,

Looking at the ODF Metadata OWL ontology, a couple of quick questions:

(1) Should odf:MetadataFile, odf:StylesFile and odf:ContentFile be explicity stated to be rdfs:subclassOf common:File ?

i.e.currently:

possible alternative:

(2) Should we specify a domain and range on common:hasPart ?