Messages per Month
| From | Sent On | Attachments |
|---|---|---|
| PORRES | Jan 30, 2007 11:18 am | .wav |
| padawan12 | Jan 31, 2007 6:14 am | |
| PORRES | Feb 2, 2007 8:55 am | |
| Patco | Feb 2, 2007 2:23 pm | |
| hard off | Feb 2, 2007 4:36 pm | |
| David Powers | Feb 2, 2007 7:23 pm | |
| hard off | Feb 2, 2007 10:09 pm | |
| hard off | Feb 2, 2007 10:30 pm | |
| carmen | Feb 2, 2007 10:57 pm | |
| patrick | Feb 2, 2007 11:10 pm | |
| PORRES | Feb 3, 2007 1:45 pm | |
| Kyle Klipowicz | Feb 4, 2007 10:44 am |
| Subject: | Re: [PD] Re: Looping | |
|---|---|---|
| From: | carmen (_...@whats-your.name) | |
| Date: | Feb 2, 2007 10:57:15 pm | |
| List: | at.iem.pd-list | |
On Sat Feb 03, 2007 at 03:10:15PM +0900, hard off wrote:
well, i just checked the sample, and it didn't loop smoothly in any software i have.
then i opened it in a sound editor, and the start point is zero, but the end point is not zero, which would be why pd makes a "drastic" click.
i will now bow out of this discussion, because i can't see why anyone would want to loop such a dodgy sample in the first place.
just ask Hairy Butter. you can loop dodgy samples by fading to 0 and back, or
using tabread4~..
_______________________________________________
PD-l...@iem.at mailing list
UNSUBSCRIBE and account-management ->
http://lists.puredata.info/listinfo/pd-list






.wav