20 messages in org.apache.james.generalRe: MarkMail: Powered by Apache James
FromSent OnAttachments
Jason HunterNov 7, 2007 6:36 pm 
Stefano BagnaraNov 8, 2007 1:02 am 
Danny AngusNov 8, 2007 1:36 am 
Noel J. BergmanNov 8, 2007 8:30 am 
Noel J. BergmanNov 8, 2007 8:34 am 
Danny AngusNov 8, 2007 8:39 am 
Noel J. BergmanNov 8, 2007 9:32 am 
Jason HunterNov 8, 2007 10:46 am 
Jason HunterNov 8, 2007 10:55 am 
Danny AngusNov 8, 2007 11:12 am 
Norman MaurerNov 8, 2007 12:16 pm 
Norman MaurerNov 8, 2007 12:17 pm 
Norman MaurerNov 8, 2007 12:18 pm 
Jason HunterNov 8, 2007 12:35 pm 
Danny AngusNov 9, 2007 12:15 am 
Robert Burrell DonkinNov 9, 2007 2:51 am 
Danny AngusNov 9, 2007 3:06 am 
Jason HunterNov 9, 2007 3:10 am 
Noel J. BergmanNov 9, 2007 9:52 am 
Robert Burrell DonkinNov 14, 2007 1:38 pm 
Actions with this message:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Atom feed for this thread
Paste this URL into your reader:
Subject:Re: MarkMail: Powered by Apache JamesActions...
From:Stefano Bagnara (apa@bago.org)
Date:Nov 8, 2007 1:02:29 am
List:org.apache.james.general

Jason Hunter ha scritto:

Some of you may have seen my announcement this morning on community@ about MarkMail, a new email archiving service. [...] Apache James lives at the heart of the email ingestion pipeline, and I wanted to write in here to say thanks to the people who built such a useful tool. Having a Java-based extensible mail processor really simplified my life. If you see me at ApacheCon, let me know: I've got a T-shirt for you. [...]

Cool! Thank you for sharing your experience!

I do have a lingering question whose answer I couldn't find in the archive:

* Is there any way to easily employ multiple match conditions (subject is X, sender contains Y) without setting up extra processors?

No, unfortunately there's no way. Programmatically it would be easy to support something similar, but it's hard to find out an easy xml configuration to define complex expressions, so we never added this feature.

Stefano