6 messages in net.nether.puck.cisco-nsp[c-nsp] BGP hardware
FromSent OnAttachments
Ronan DalyJan 23, 2005 6:33 pm 
Elmar K. BinsJan 23, 2005 6:49 pm 
Simon Hamilton-WilkesJan 23, 2005 9:31 pm 
Brian FeenyJan 23, 2005 11:38 pm 
Gert DoeringJan 24, 2005 2:45 am 
Kristofer SigurdssonJan 24, 2005 2:55 am 
Actions with this message:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Atom feed for this thread
Paste this URL into your reader:
Subject:[c-nsp] BGP hardwareActions...
From:Gert Doering (ge@greenie.muc.de)
Date:Jan 24, 2005 2:45:14 am
List:net.nether.puck.cisco-nsp

Hi,

On Sun, Jan 23, 2005 at 11:37:39PM +0000, Ronan Daly wrote:

I'm looking into running eBGP with three providers and taking full tables from all three. I've currently got a 3725 with 256MB of RAM, a NM-2FE2W and a NM-1FE2W. Would that be enough to handle the three tables if I'm pushing under 20Mb/s?

The 3725 is a good start. If you regularily see CPU over 50%, it's time to consider something more powerful...

I'm also considering getting a second router for redundancy - maybe a 3825 or a 7200 ebay special. Anyone have any recommendations for this?

... like a 2851 or so. The 3825 might be overkill if you only have 20 Mbit/s. traffic.

If you go for a 7200, you need to get at least a NPE-400 to get something which can take more than 256 Mb RAM, which *will* be a need in the years to come. (Also, a NPE-225 is likely to be slower than a 2851).

gert