12 messages in ru.sysoev.nginxRe: Upstream fail over?
FromSent OnAttachments
MortenPJun 23, 2009 7:48 am 
merlin coreyJun 26, 2009 2:32 am 
Mitchua MitchuaJul 26, 2009 7:42 am 
Maxim DouninJul 26, 2009 1:55 pm 
Marcus ClyneJul 26, 2009 6:30 pm 
Igor SysoevJul 27, 2009 1:47 am 
Mahiti SupportJul 31, 2009 6:11 am 
Maxim DouninJul 31, 2009 6:38 am 
Mitchua MitchuaJul 31, 2009 10:38 am 
Mitchua MitchuaJul 31, 2009 10:59 am 
Maxim DouninJul 31, 2009 12:52 pm 
mitchuaAug 2, 2009 9:09 am 
Actions with this message:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Atom feed for this thread
Paste this URL into your reader:
Subject:Re: Upstream fail over?Actions...
From:Igor Sysoev (is@rambler-co.ru)
Date:Jul 27, 2009 1:47:22 am
List:ru.sysoev.nginx

On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 10:48:41AM -0400, MortenP wrote:

Is it possible to have nginx proxy to upstream_a and if that fails then default
to upstream_b?

What I would like to accomplish is to have a Varnish upstream, and if that's
down, then nginx should just proxy to the application backend directly.

upstream ups { server upstream_a; server upstream_b backup; }

However, probably you may omit Varnish and use nginx's proxy cache.

-- Igor Sysoev http://sysoev.ru/en/