Beautiful !
However there is a big difference between cock-ups and deliberate
policy which is why the email response to you has been
placed on the web so others can review the historical facts
http://www.oic.org/z/XZIG/UNCEFACT/IXUAEN1.htm
Any comments particularly on how to resolve the issue within
EDIFACT-UN/CEFACT would be appreciated as the Tenders
for the Melbourne Port and Victorian 32 Local Government Agencies
are critical for early 2007
WOULD IT BE ACCEPTABLE TO REPLACE THE FOLLOWING
DATA ELEMENTS IN THE "NAD" DATA SEGMENT
1 CO58
2 CO80
3 CO59
WITH THE COMPLEX VERSION OF AS 4590
http://www.oic.org/z/XZIG/AS4590/add/
Comments would be appreciated by 17:00 Wed 20 Dec Sydney time
for the eCommittee review Thu 21 Dec 2006
Thank you
On 17 Dec 06, at 15:49, David RR Webber wrote:
Came across this today - this is probably so the "enemy" does not know where
the troops are - but then again - how do they get their mail?!?
http://www.usps.com/ncsc/lookups/usps_abbreviations.html
and
Military "State"
Abbreviation
Armed Forces Africa
AE
Armed Forces Americas
(except Canada)
AA
Armed Forces Canada
AE
Armed Forces Europe
AE
Armed Forces Middle East
AE
Armed Forces Pacific
2 messages in org.oasis-open.lists.ubl-devRe: [ubl-dev] Mentioning codelist per...