I'll add this to our agenda for next week's meeting.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jirka Kosek" <jir...@kosek.cz>
To: "Scott Hudson" <scot...@flatironssolutions.com>
Cc: "DocBook Technical Committee" <docb...@lists.oasis-open.org>
Sent: Tuesday, February 07, 2006 12:32 PM
Subject: Re: [docbook-tc] Re: [members] Membership and Public Review of
OASIS Artifact Standard Identification Scheme for Metadata
Scott Hudson wrote:
In this section, it states:
"All OASIS-defined http scheme namespaces MUST use domain names owned by
OASIS and as approved from time to time by the TC Administrator."
For DocBook V5, does our "http://docbook.org/ns/docbook" namespace
conform to these guidelines? Is this namespace an approved exception?
These guidelines were not pubslihed when we voted for this namespace.
There are many OASIS namespaces in use that are not conforming to this
rule. See
http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/docbook-tc/200503/msg00000.html
So I don't see any possible problem here.
Jirka
--
------------------------------------------------------------------
Jirka Kosek e-mail: jir...@kosek.cz http://www.kosek.cz
------------------------------------------------------------------
Profesionální ¹kolení a poradenství v oblasti technologií XML.
Podívejte se na ná¹ novì spu¹tìný web http://DocBook.cz
Podrobný pøehled ¹kolení http://xmlguru.cz/skoleni/
------------------------------------------------------------------
Nejbli¾¹í termíny ¹kolení:
** XSLT 13.-16.3.2006 ** XML schémata 24.-26.4.2006 **
** DocBook 15.-17.5.2006 ** XSL-FO 12.-13.6.2006 **
1 message in org.oasis-open.lists.docbook-tcRe: [docbook-tc] Re: [members] Member...