14 messages in org.apache.legal-discussRe: Maven repository issues [Was: Cre...
FromSent OnAttachments
Henri YandellMay 29, 2008 1:06 am 
Stefano BagnaraMay 29, 2008 1:17 am 
Assaf ArkinMay 29, 2008 10:53 am 
Henri YandellMay 29, 2008 12:10 pm 
Stefano BagnaraMay 29, 2008 12:35 pm 
David JencksMay 29, 2008 12:47 pm 
Craig L RussellMay 29, 2008 2:38 pm 
Gilles ScokartMay 30, 2008 1:04 am 
Stefano BagnaraMay 30, 2008 1:47 am 
Assaf ArkinMay 30, 2008 2:50 am 
sebbMay 30, 2008 2:51 am 
Stefano BagnaraMay 30, 2008 3:33 am 
Assaf ArkinMay 30, 2008 4:33 am 
Gilles ScokartMay 30, 2008 4:35 am 
Actions with this message:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Paste this link in email or IM:
Atom feed for this thread
Paste this URL into your reader:
Subject:Re: Maven repository issues [Was: Creative Commons Attribution License]Actions...
From:Gilles Scokart (gsco@gmail.com)
Date:May 30, 2008 4:35:16 am
List:org.apache.legal-discuss

2008/5/30 Stefano Bagnara <apa@bago.org>:

IMHO (IANAL) the simplest pom having only a groupId/artifactId/version (so the one automatically generated by maven is not a creative work: does anyone disagree on this?

Maybe... maybe not. Even this doesn't seems to be always so trivial.

As an example, look at the pom of jaxb. Different people made different choices for the name [1]. Also I have already read quiet a lot of discussion about which name to choose (sorry, I don't have time to search for a link).

In both case, that means there are choices.

I don't know if that imply creativity. A lawer should answer that. But I guess that it is safer to consider that it does.

[1] http://markmail.org/message/v5522sndfcnx47sh