4 messages in com.perforce.jamming[jamming] jam jobs in the Public Depot
Subject:[jamming] jam jobs in the Public Depot
From: ()
Date:02/26/2002 11:10:15 AM
List:com.perforce.jamming

----- Original Message ----- From: <rm@perforce.com>

I think you should seriously consider fixing the buffer overrun problems also, especially those in expand.c.

Would "you" - by which I mean both you, David, and all of jammingdom - favor delaying the "finalization" of 2.4 for this?

Not based on the criteria you outline below, no.

My _intent_ of the moment is just to fix things that would inhibit a happy "stock" 2.3.1 user from wanting to upgrade to 2.4; my _hope_ of the moment is that this could happen very soon. (Also, we'll benefit from my simply having gone through a first iteration at the release packaging (etc) process).

Larger changes, (including ones like buffer overrun problems, to which your fixes are, I presume, extensive) would be addressed in a later release.

OK by me. I guess it doesn't matter that much to us until you get all of our enhancements ;-)